From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans De Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: scan: Rearrange memory allocation in acpi_device_add()
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:46:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2999734.9HhbEeWEHR@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3494203.VBaj39JGmp@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The upfront allocation of new_bus_id is done to avoid allocating
memory under acpi_device_lock, but it doesn't really help,
because (1) it leads to many unnecessary memory allocations for
_ADR devices, (2) kstrdup_const() is run under that lock anyway and
(3) it complicates the code.
Rearrange acpi_device_add() to allocate memory for a new struct
acpi_device_bus_id instance only when necessary, eliminate a redundant
local variable from it and reduce the number of labels in there.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -621,12 +621,23 @@ void acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(struct acp
put_device(&adev->dev);
}
+static struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id_match(const char *dev_id)
+{
+ struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id;
+
+ /* Find suitable bus_id and instance number in acpi_bus_id_list. */
+ list_for_each_entry(acpi_device_bus_id, &acpi_bus_id_list, node) {
+ if (!strcmp(acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id, dev_id))
+ return acpi_device_bus_id;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
void (*release)(struct device *))
{
+ struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id;
int result;
- struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id, *new_bus_id;
- int found = 0;
if (device->handle) {
acpi_status status;
@@ -652,38 +663,26 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->del_list);
mutex_init(&device->physical_node_lock);
- new_bus_id = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device_bus_id), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!new_bus_id) {
- pr_err(PREFIX "Memory allocation error\n");
- result = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_detach;
- }
-
mutex_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
- /*
- * Find suitable bus_id and instance number in acpi_bus_id_list
- * If failed, create one and link it into acpi_bus_id_list
- */
- list_for_each_entry(acpi_device_bus_id, &acpi_bus_id_list, node) {
- if (!strcmp(acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id,
- acpi_device_hid(device))) {
- acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no++;
- found = 1;
- kfree(new_bus_id);
- break;
+
+ acpi_device_bus_id = acpi_device_bus_id_match(acpi_device_hid(device));
+ if (acpi_device_bus_id) {
+ acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no++;
+ } else {
+ acpi_device_bus_id = kzalloc(sizeof(*acpi_device_bus_id),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!acpi_device_bus_id) {
+ result = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_unlock;
}
- }
- if (!found) {
- acpi_device_bus_id = new_bus_id;
acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id =
kstrdup_const(acpi_device_hid(device), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id) {
- pr_err(PREFIX "Memory allocation error for bus id\n");
+ kfree(acpi_device_bus_id);
result = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_free_new_bus_id;
+ goto err_unlock;
}
- acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no = 0;
list_add_tail(&acpi_device_bus_id->node, &acpi_bus_id_list);
}
dev_set_name(&device->dev, "%s:%02x", acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id, acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no);
@@ -718,13 +717,9 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *
list_del(&device->node);
list_del(&device->wakeup_list);
- err_free_new_bus_id:
- if (!found)
- kfree(new_bus_id);
-
+ err_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
- err_detach:
acpi_detach_data(device->handle, acpi_scan_drop_device);
return result;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 18:45 [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Janitorial changes in acpi_device_add() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-14 18:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-01-16 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: scan: Rearrange memory allocation " Hans de Goede
2021-01-18 15:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-18 15:26 ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-18 15:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-18 15:34 ` Hans de Goede
2021-01-14 18:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI: scan: Adjust white space " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-16 12:36 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2999734.9HhbEeWEHR@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).