From: teawater <teawaterz@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_mem: prevent overflow with subblock size
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:12:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2D9A07BA-6FDC-48FF-9A1F-62272695B3EF@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0930c9d0-0708-c079-29bd-b80d4e3ce446@redhat.com>
> 2020年6月8日 14:58,David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> 写道:
>
> On 08.06.20 08:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> If subblock size is large (e.g. 1G) 32 bit math involving it
>> can overflow. Rather than try to catch all instances of that,
>> let's tweak block size to 64 bit.
>
> I fail to see where we could actually trigger an overflow. The reported
> warning looked like a false positive to me.
>
>>
>> It ripples through UAPI which is an ABI change, but it's not too late to
>> make it, and it will allow supporting >4Gbyte blocks while might
>> become necessary down the road.
>>
>
> This might break cloud-hypervisor, who's already implementing this
> protocol upstream (ccing Hui).
> https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor/blob/master/vm-virtio/src/mem.rs
>
> (blocks in the gigabyte range were never the original intention of
> virtio-mem, but I am not completely opposed to that)
If you think virtio_mem need this patch, I think cloud-hypervisor should follow this update (I will post PR for it).
Best,
Hui
>
>> Fixes: 5f1f79bbc9e26 ("virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotplug")
>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_mem.h | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>> index 2f357142ea5e..7b1bece8a331 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct virtio_mem {
>> uint64_t requested_size;
>>
>> /* The device block size (for communicating with the device). */
>> - uint32_t device_block_size;
>> + uint64_t device_block_size;
>> /* The translated node id. NUMA_NO_NODE in case not specified. */
>> int nid;
>> /* Physical start address of the memory region. */
>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct virtio_mem {
>> uint64_t region_size;
>>
>> /* The subblock size. */
>> - uint32_t subblock_size;
>> + uint64_t subblock_size;
>> /* The number of subblocks per memory block. */
>> uint32_t nb_sb_per_mb;
>>
>> @@ -1698,9 +1698,9 @@ static int virtio_mem_init(struct virtio_mem *vm)
>> * - At least the device block size.
>> * In the worst case, a single subblock per memory block.
>> */
>> - vm->subblock_size = PAGE_SIZE * 1u << max_t(uint32_t, MAX_ORDER - 1,
>> - pageblock_order);
>> - vm->subblock_size = max_t(uint32_t, vm->device_block_size,
>> + vm->subblock_size = PAGE_SIZE * 1ul << max_t(uint32_t, MAX_ORDER - 1,
>> + pageblock_order);
>> + vm->subblock_size = max_t(uint64_t, vm->device_block_size,
>> vm->subblock_size);
>> vm->nb_sb_per_mb = memory_block_size_bytes() / vm->subblock_size;
>>
>> @@ -1713,8 +1713,8 @@ static int virtio_mem_init(struct virtio_mem *vm)
>>
>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "start address: 0x%llx", vm->addr);
>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "region size: 0x%llx", vm->region_size);
>> - dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "device block size: 0x%x",
>> - vm->device_block_size);
>> + dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "device block size: 0x%llx",
>> + (unsigned long long)vm->device_block_size);
>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "memory block size: 0x%lx",
>> memory_block_size_bytes());
>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "subblock size: 0x%x",
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mem.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mem.h
>> index a455c488a995..a9ffe041843c 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mem.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_mem.h
>> @@ -185,10 +185,10 @@ struct virtio_mem_resp {
>>
>> struct virtio_mem_config {
>> /* Block size and alignment. Cannot change. */
>> - __u32 block_size;
>> + __u64 block_size;
>> /* Valid with VIRTIO_MEM_F_ACPI_PXM. Cannot change. */
>> __u16 node_id;
>> - __u16 padding;
>> + __u8 padding[6];
>> /* Start address of the memory region. Cannot change. */
>> __u64 addr;
>> /* Region size (maximum). Cannot change. */
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 6:14 [PATCH] virtio_mem: prevent overflow with subblock size Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-08 6:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-08 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-08 7:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-08 9:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-06-08 7:12 ` teawater [this message]
2020-06-08 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-08 18:18 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2D9A07BA-6FDC-48FF-9A1F-62272695B3EF@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=teawaterz@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).