From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261660AbTLHTe1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:34:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261460AbTLHTe1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:34:27 -0500 Received: from ns.transas.com ([193.125.200.2]:8974 "EHLO harvester.transas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261660AbTLHTeV (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:34:21 -0500 Message-ID: <2E74F312D6980D459F3A05492BA40F8D0391B0F0@clue.transas.com> From: Andrew Volkov To: William Lee Irwin III , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: PROBLEM: possible proceses leak Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:34:13 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah, really magic, sorry for troubles. Andrey > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> Heh, no wonder everyone wants to get rid of the things. > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:09:41AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > No, they are all correct. No bug here, move along folks, > nothing to see.. > > Linus > > Looks like I missed that bit of preempt magic the first time around > the need_resched: path in entry.S. Easy enough to drop this one. > > > -- wli >