From: Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>, <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce short duration task check
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:06:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a54f264-de3d-d5a3-941a-016ed2cfea0a@didichuxing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5gRsnLQLlzugB4I@chenyu5-mobl1>
On 2022/12/13 13:46, Chen Yu wrote:
> On 2022-12-12 at 10:17:35 -0800, Josh Don wrote:
>>> BTW, I've changed the threshold to (sysctl_sched_min_granularity / 8) in my next
>>> version, as this is the value that fit my previous test case and also not to break
>>> the case Josh mentioned.
>>
>> Do you mean a hardcoded value of some number of micros, or literally
>> sched_min_granularity / 8?
> The latter. According to the test, the average task duration when system
> is under heavy load:
> 6 ~ 9 us for netperf
> 7 ~ 70 us for hackbench
> 7 ~ 8 us for tbench
> 13 ~ 20 ms for schbench
> Overall the duration of the micros are quite small(except for schbench).
> The default sysctl_sched_min_granularity is 750 us in kernel if no user
> has changed it. Then 750 / 8 = 93 us, which is close to what you suggested(100us).
> On the other hand, if someone changes sysctl_sched_min_granularity,
> then '8' can be viewed as log2(256). That is, if there are 256 CPUs online,
> and the sysctl_sched_min_granularity is changed to 750 us * log2(256) by
> the user, we can devide the sysctl_sched_min_granularity by 8 in case the
> sysctl_sched_min_granularity is too large.
>
Hi Yu,
Seems there is a min_t() call in get_update_sysctl_factor(). In most
cases, we'll get 750 us * (1+log2(8)) = 3000 us in default due to
sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling is set as '1' default. (Correct me if I
misunderstand).
For the value in production environment, I've seen 10 ms and 3 ms in
different place, FYI. Hope this help.
Thanks,
Honglei
> My concern of using hardcoded value is that, this value depends on how fast
> the CPU runs(cpu frequency). The value I measured above is when the
> CPU is running at 1.9Ghz. If a CPU runs faster, a hard code value might not
> be appropriate and could not be tuned.
>> I don't think the latter is necessary, and
>> indeed can lead to weirdness if min_gran is too small or too large. I
>> don't think the concept of what a short duration task is should
>> expand/contract with min_gran.
> The value of sysctl_sched_min_granularity might indicate how long the
> user would like a task to run at least. If the user enlarge this value,
> does it mean the user wants every task in the system to run longer?
> From this point I found connection between the the definition of short task
> duration and this value. I'm open to changing this value to a fixed one, may
> I have more insights on how this value would be set in production environment?
>
> thanks,
> Chenyu
>>
>> Best,
>> Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 8:43 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/fair: Choose the CPU where short task is running during wake up Chen Yu
2022-12-01 8:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce short duration task check Chen Yu
2022-12-02 7:44 ` Honglei Wang
2022-12-03 7:49 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-03 15:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-05 8:38 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-05 9:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-12-05 14:38 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-07 2:23 ` Josh Don
2022-12-07 14:24 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-12 11:22 ` Yicong Yang
2022-12-12 14:33 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-12 18:17 ` Josh Don
2022-12-13 5:46 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-13 10:06 ` Honglei Wang [this message]
2022-12-13 12:24 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-01 8:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/fair: Choose the CPU where short task is running during wake up Chen Yu
2022-12-05 2:36 ` Tianchen Ding
2022-12-05 8:40 ` Chen Yu
2022-12-06 13:02 ` Yicong Yang
2022-12-07 3:54 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a54f264-de3d-d5a3-941a-016ed2cfea0a@didichuxing.com \
--to=wanghonglei@didichuxing.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).