linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] module: Improve support for asynchronous module exit code
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:27:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2acc2220-65dc-4af5-ffd3-997f779d41c0@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzOe3pYmn5qO9lFb@T590>

On 9/27/22 18:09, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:56:20PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Some kernel modules call device_del() from their module exit code and
>> schedule asynchronous work from inside the .release callback without waiting
>> until that callback has finished. As an example, many SCSI LLD drivers call
> 
> It isn't only related with device, any kobject has such issue, or any
> reference counter usage has similar potential risk, see previous discussion:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YsZm7lSXYAHT14ui@T590/
> 
> IMO, it is one fundamental problem wrt. module vs. reference counting or
> kobject uses at least, since the callback depends on module code
> segment.
> 
>> scsi_remove_host() from their module exit code. scsi_remove_host() may
>> invoke scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() asynchronously.
>> scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() uses the host template pointer and
>> that pointer usually exists in static storage in the SCSI LLD. Support
>> using the module reference count to keep the module around until
>> asynchronous module exiting has completed by waiting in the delete_module()
>> system call until the module reference count drops to zero.
> 
> The issue can't be addressed by the normal mod->refcnt, since user need
> to unload module when the device isn't used.

Hi Ming,

How about removing support for calling scsi_device_put() from atomic context
as is done in the untested patch below?

Thanks,

Bart.

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
index c59eac7a32f2..661753a10b47 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -561,6 +561,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_report_opcode);
   */
  int scsi_device_get(struct scsi_device *sdev)
  {
+	might_sleep();
+
  	if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_CANCEL)
  		goto fail;
  	if (!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
@@ -588,6 +590,7 @@ void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
  {
  	struct module *mod = sdev->host->hostt->module;

+	might_sleep();
  	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
  	module_put(mod);
  }
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index a3aaafdeac1d..4cfc9317b4ad 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static void scsi_device_cls_release(struct device *class_dev)
  	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
  }

-static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)
+static void scsi_device_dev_release(struct device *dev)
  {
  	struct scsi_device *sdev;
  	struct device *parent;
@@ -450,11 +450,8 @@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)
  	struct scsi_vpd *vpd_pg0 = NULL, *vpd_pg89 = NULL;
  	struct scsi_vpd *vpd_pgb0 = NULL, *vpd_pgb1 = NULL, *vpd_pgb2 = NULL;
  	unsigned long flags;
-	struct module *mod;
-
-	sdev = container_of(work, struct scsi_device, ew.work);

-	mod = sdev->host->hostt->module;
+	sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);

  	parent = sdev->sdev_gendev.parent;

@@ -516,19 +513,6 @@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)

  	if (parent)
  		put_device(parent);
-	module_put(mod);
-}
-
-static void scsi_device_dev_release(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct scsi_device *sdp = to_scsi_device(dev);
-
-	/* Set module pointer as NULL in case of module unloading */
-	if (!try_module_get(sdp->host->hostt->module))
-		sdp->host->hostt->module = NULL;
-
-	execute_in_process_context(scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext,
-				   &sdp->ew);
  }

  static struct class sdev_class = {

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-28 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220914225621.415631-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
2022-09-14 22:56 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] module: Improve support for asynchronous module exit code Bart Van Assche
2022-09-20 17:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-28  0:02     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-09-28 18:17       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-30 19:39         ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-10-03 23:56           ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-10-04  0:24             ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-28  1:09   ` Ming Lei
2022-09-28 19:27     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-09-29  1:10       ` Ming Lei
2022-09-29 17:27         ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2acc2220-65dc-4af5-ffd3-997f779d41c0@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).