From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Marc Smith <msmith626@gmail.com>
Cc: Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
it+raid@molgen.mpg.de
Subject: Re: md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle" transition
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:55:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af18cf7-05eb-f1d1-616a-2c5894d1ac43@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6h+hf7Y-kurBJG+pnH6WCQiaEK+Jq3KG5JOGnHJ4Uw6AbUjg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/14/23 21:25, Marc Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:49 PM Guoqing Jiang
> <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> wrote:
>> Hi Donald,
>>
>> On 2/8/21 19:41, Donald Buczek wrote:
>>> Dear Guoqing,
>>>
>>> On 08.02.21 15:53, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/8/21 12:38, Donald Buczek wrote:
>>>>>> 5. maybe don't hold reconfig_mutex when try to unregister
>>>>>> sync_thread, like this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* resync has finished, collect result */
>>>>>> mddev_unlock(mddev);
>>>>>> md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
>>>>>> mddev_lock(mddev);
>>>>> As above: While we wait for the sync thread to terminate, wouldn't it
>>>>> be a problem, if another user space operation takes the mutex?
>>>> I don't think other places can be blocked while hold mutex, otherwise
>>>> these places can cause potential deadlock. Please try above two lines
>>>> change. And perhaps others have better idea.
>>> Yes, this works. No deadlock after >11000 seconds,
>>>
>>> (Time till deadlock from previous runs/seconds: 1723, 37, 434, 1265,
>>> 3500, 1136, 109, 1892, 1060, 664, 84, 315, 12, 820 )
>> Great. I will send a formal patch with your reported-by and tested-by.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guoqing
> I'm still hitting this issue with Linux 5.4.229 -- it looks like 1/2
> of the patches that supposedly resolve this were applied to the stable
> kernels, however, one was omitted due to a regression:
> md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held (upstream
> commit 8b48ec23cc51a4e7c8dbaef5f34ebe67e1a80934)
>
> I don't see any follow-up on the thread from June 8th 2022 asking for
> this patch to be dropped from all stable kernels since it caused a
> regression.
>
> The patch doesn't appear to be present in the current mainline kernel
> (6.3-rc2) either. So I assume this issue is still present there, or it
> was resolved differently and I just can't find the commit/patch.
It should be fixed by commit 9dfbdafda3b3"md: unlock mddev before reap
sync_thread in action_store".
Thanks,
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-28 12:25 md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle" transition Donald Buczek
2020-11-30 2:06 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-12-01 9:29 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-02 17:28 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-03 1:55 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-12-03 11:42 ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-21 12:33 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-19 11:30 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-20 16:33 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-23 13:04 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25 8:54 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25 21:32 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 0:44 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 9:50 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 11:14 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 12:58 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 14:06 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 16:05 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-02 15:42 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 11:38 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-08 14:53 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 18:41 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-09 0:46 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-09 9:24 ` Donald Buczek
2023-03-14 13:25 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-14 13:55 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2023-03-14 14:45 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-16 15:25 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-29 0:01 ` Song Liu
2023-08-22 21:16 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-23 1:22 ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-23 15:33 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-24 1:18 ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-28 20:32 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-30 1:36 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05 3:50 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05 13:54 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-13 9:08 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-13 14:16 ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-14 6:03 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-17 8:55 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-24 14:35 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25 1:11 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-25 9:11 ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25 9:32 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 3:02 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 9:30 ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-03-15 9:53 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15 7:52 ` Donald Buczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2af18cf7-05eb-f1d1-616a-2c5894d1ac43@linux.dev \
--to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
--cc=buczek@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=it+raid@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msmith626@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).