linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Marc Smith <msmith626@gmail.com>
Cc: Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	it+raid@molgen.mpg.de
Subject: Re: md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle" transition
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:55:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af18cf7-05eb-f1d1-616a-2c5894d1ac43@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6h+hf7Y-kurBJG+pnH6WCQiaEK+Jq3KG5JOGnHJ4Uw6AbUjg@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/14/23 21:25, Marc Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:49 PM Guoqing Jiang
> <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com> wrote:
>> Hi Donald,
>>
>> On 2/8/21 19:41, Donald Buczek wrote:
>>> Dear Guoqing,
>>>
>>> On 08.02.21 15:53, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/8/21 12:38, Donald Buczek wrote:
>>>>>> 5. maybe don't hold reconfig_mutex when try to unregister
>>>>>> sync_thread, like this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           /* resync has finished, collect result */
>>>>>>           mddev_unlock(mddev);
>>>>>>           md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
>>>>>>           mddev_lock(mddev);
>>>>> As above: While we wait for the sync thread to terminate, wouldn't it
>>>>> be a problem, if another user space operation takes the mutex?
>>>> I don't think other places can be blocked while hold mutex, otherwise
>>>> these places can cause potential deadlock. Please try above two lines
>>>> change. And perhaps others have better idea.
>>> Yes, this works. No deadlock after >11000 seconds,
>>>
>>> (Time till deadlock from previous runs/seconds: 1723, 37, 434, 1265,
>>> 3500, 1136, 109, 1892, 1060, 664, 84, 315, 12, 820 )
>> Great. I will send a formal patch with your reported-by and tested-by.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guoqing
> I'm still hitting this issue with Linux 5.4.229 -- it looks like 1/2
> of the patches that supposedly resolve this were applied to the stable
> kernels, however, one was omitted due to a regression:
> md: don't unregister sync_thread with reconfig_mutex held (upstream
> commit 8b48ec23cc51a4e7c8dbaef5f34ebe67e1a80934)
>
> I don't see any follow-up on the thread from June 8th 2022 asking for
> this patch to be dropped from all stable kernels since it caused a
> regression.
>
> The patch doesn't appear to be present in the current mainline kernel
> (6.3-rc2) either. So I assume this issue is still present there, or it
> was resolved differently and I just can't find the commit/patch.

It should be fixed by commit 9dfbdafda3b3"md: unlock mddev before reap
sync_thread in action_store".

Thanks,
Guoqing

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-14 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-28 12:25 md_raid: mdX_raid6 looping after sync_action "check" to "idle" transition Donald Buczek
2020-11-30  2:06 ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-12-01  9:29   ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-02 17:28     ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-03  1:55       ` Guoqing Jiang
2020-12-03 11:42         ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-21 12:33           ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-19 11:30             ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-20 16:33               ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-23 13:04                 ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25  8:54                   ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-25 21:32                     ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26  0:44                       ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26  9:50                         ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 11:14                           ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 12:58                             ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-26 14:06                               ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-01-26 16:05                                 ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-02 15:42                                   ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 11:38                                     ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-08 14:53                                       ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-08 18:41                                         ` Donald Buczek
2021-02-09  0:46                                           ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-02-09  9:24                                             ` Donald Buczek
2023-03-14 13:25                                             ` Marc Smith
2023-03-14 13:55                                               ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2023-03-14 14:45                                                 ` Marc Smith
2023-03-16 15:25                                                   ` Marc Smith
2023-03-29  0:01                                                     ` Song Liu
2023-08-22 21:16                                                       ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-23  1:22                                                         ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-23 15:33                                                           ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-24  1:18                                                             ` Yu Kuai
2023-08-28 20:32                                                               ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-08-30  1:36                                                                 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05  3:50                                                                   ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-05 13:54                                                                     ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-13  9:08                                                                       ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-13 14:16                                                                         ` Dragan Stancevic
2023-09-14  6:03                                                                           ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-17  8:55                                                                             ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-24 14:35                                                                               ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25  1:11                                                                                 ` Yu Kuai
2023-09-25  9:11                                                                                   ` Donald Buczek
2023-09-25  9:32                                                                                     ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  3:02                                                 ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  9:30                                                   ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-03-15  9:53                                                     ` Yu Kuai
2023-03-15  7:52                                               ` Donald Buczek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2af18cf7-05eb-f1d1-616a-2c5894d1ac43@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=buczek@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=it+raid@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msmith626@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).