linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave P Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: xen/evtchn and forced threaded irq
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:17:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c5300a3-ed7f-c1a3-81d3-35adb23bea4c@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e256d9a-572c-e01e-7706-407f99245b00@arm.com>

On 19/02/2019 18:31, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have been looking at using Linux RT in Dom0. Once the guest is started,
> the console is ending to have a lot of warning (see trace below).
> 
> After some investigation, this is because the irq handler will now be threaded.
> I can reproduce the same error with the vanilla Linux when passing the option
> 'threadirqs' on the command line (the trace below is from 5.0.0-rc7 that has
> not RT support).
> 
> FWIW, the interrupt for port 6 is used to for the guest to communicate with
> xenstore.
> 
> From my understanding, this is happening because the interrupt handler is now
> run in a thread. So we can have the following happening.
> 
>    Interrupt context            |     Interrupt thread
>                                 |  
>    receive interrupt port 6     |
>    clear the evtchn port        |
>    set IRQF_RUNTHREAD	        |
>    kick interrupt thread        |
>                                 |    clear IRQF_RUNTHREAD
>                                 |    call evtchn_interrupt
>    receive interrupt port 6     |
>    clear the evtchn port        |
>    set IRQF_RUNTHREAD           |
>    kick interrupt thread        |
>                                 |    disable interrupt port 6
>                                 |    evtchn->enabled = false
>                                 |    [....]
>                                 |
>                                 |    *** Handling the second interrupt ***
>                                 |    clear IRQF_RUNTHREAD
>                                 |    call evtchn_interrupt
>                                 |    WARN(...)
> 
> I am not entirely sure how to fix this. I have two solutions in mind:
> 
> 1) Prevent the interrupt handler to be threaded. We would also need to
> switch from spin_lock to raw_spin_lock as the former may sleep on RT-Linux.
> 
> 2) Remove the warning

3) Split the handler (RT-only?) to a non-threaded part containing
   everything until the "evtchn->enabled = false" and only then
   kick the thread doing the rest, including the spin_lock().

Juergen

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-19 17:31 xen/evtchn and forced threaded irq Julien Grall
2019-02-20  0:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-02-20 14:15   ` Julien Grall
2019-02-20 17:07     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-02-20 18:05       ` Julien Grall
2019-02-20 20:04         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-02-20 20:46           ` Julien Grall
2019-02-20 21:46             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-02-20 22:03               ` Julien Grall
2019-02-21  8:07                 ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné
     [not found]                   ` <CAF3u54Ct7nBjoLw9Vzb=aZVu=N5Ccp5_k6GxLo_ZSA=YCsco6A@mail.gmail.com>
2019-02-21  8:52                     ` Juergen Gross
2019-02-21  9:14                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-02-21 20:46                       ` Julien Grall
2020-04-27 23:20                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-22 11:44                 ` Jan Beulich
2019-02-22 12:38             ` [Xen-devel] " Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-02-22 13:33               ` Julien Grall
2019-02-25 13:24                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-02-25 13:55                   ` Julien Grall
2019-02-25 14:08                     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-02-25 15:26                       ` Julien Grall
2019-02-26  9:14                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-02-26  9:30                       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-02-26  9:44                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-02-26 10:03                           ` Julien Grall
2019-02-26 10:17                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-02-26 10:26                               ` Julien Grall
2019-02-26 11:02                                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-02-27 11:09                                   ` Julien Grall
2019-02-26  9:45                         ` Paul Durrant
2019-02-21  8:17 ` Juergen Gross [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c5300a3-ed7f-c1a3-81d3-35adb23bea4c@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).