From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE584C43467 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886FA21527 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729578AbgJHLw2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:52:28 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2965 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729056AbgJHLwX (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 07:52:23 -0400 Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id ECF6381D48C2EA3B2156; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:52:20 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.210.169.237) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:52:19 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs To: kajoljain , "acme@kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "jolsa@redhat.com" , "irogers@google.com" , "leo.yan@linaro.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" , "mathieu.poirier@linaro.org" CC: Linuxarm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com" , Zhangshaokun , "james.clark@arm.com" , "linux-imx@nxp.com" References: <1602152121-240367-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1f1c4537-2224-cd83-a10a-947ef8cd2864@linux.ibm.com> From: John Garry Message-ID: <2ca3d31e-478f-5e0a-dd36-37e84e4abf7c@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:49:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1f1c4537-2224-cd83-a10a-947ef8cd2864@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.210.169.237] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml730-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.81) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/10/2020 12:27, kajoljain wrote: > Hi John, > I am looking into these patches, it seems they are not re-based on top of > latest Arnaldo's perf/core branch. Can you rebase these changes. I think we are missing > multiple updates. > > > Thanks, > Kajol Jain > Hi Kajol Jain, My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here. However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as baseline, so I'll look at that now. Thanks, John [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1602149181-237415-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com/T/#mc34f758ab72f3d4a90d854b9bda7e6bbb90835b2