From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933663AbcFQMIG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:08:06 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:34175 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753481AbcFQMIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:08:02 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,483,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="989784243" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] acpi i2c: Initialize info.type from of_compatible To: Mika Westerberg References: <13cb5b7766b1b25a2bb61ce0053a38f6f440907b.1466014238.git.leonard.crestez@intel.com> <20160616081145.GU1740@lahna.fi.intel.com> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila , Jarkko Nikula From: Crestez Dan Leonard Message-ID: <2ca8f355-bb28-8b68-7579-e26eaee3550a@intel.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:07:39 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160616081145.GU1740@lahna.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/16/2016 11:11 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:30:28PM +0300, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: >> When using devicetree i2c_board_info.type is set to the compatible >> string with the vendor prefix removed. For I2C devices described via >> ACPI the i2c_board_info.type string is set to the ACPI device name. When >> using ACPI and DT ids this string ends up something like "PRP0001:00". >> >> If the of_compatible property is present try to use that instead. This >> makes it easier to instantiate i2c drivers through ACPI with DT ids. > > Adding Jarkko -- he was the original author of I2C/SPI device naming in > ACPI. Since this only affects devices with PRP0001 in their _HID/_CID, > it should not break anything. It's possible to have something like this: Name (_HID, "XXX1234") Name (_CID, "PRP0001") Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"compatible", "vendor,x1234"}, } }) With these patches the i2c device name changes from "XXX1234:00" to "x1234". This would happen even if a driver matches the XXX1234 acpi ID. It's not clear if anyone actually uses that or if this change would be harmful. It theory it would be possible to use of_compatible for naming only if there are no other real IDs. I don't think it's worthwhile.