From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC9EC4338F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E6B60EBC for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235936AbhHKBAH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:00:07 -0400 Received: from zg8tmty1ljiyny4xntqumjca.icoremail.net ([165.227.154.27]:37199 "HELO zg8tmty1ljiyny4xntqumjca.icoremail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S231423AbhHKBAG (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:00:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pku.edu.cn; s=dkim; h=Received:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc: Date:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:User-Agent:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=bkyTr8U9mDgH26ArdVJoULtROyWhuFWJsu f21BkcZDw=; b=dbVwKKMGPNg06LIxiY+qWAS3QOsq926JtQQVHit70fpesl/m3q zDD7lwxayURSKEa81YSPyxhUAm6YwkQ95aWmF0uuHRLK6pD7VL+f1GN4b88xxMjl N8Dwi+iUwYz7puHg70ij4KufnEg3Ln550fsDSpQsObfvcR8EWsRrm23t8= Received: from [10.8.0.4] (unknown [222.29.156.242]) by front02 (Coremail) with SMTP id 54FpogBHT+OxIBNh_6YuAg--.56139S2; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:58:26 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <2ddec0b8f77a275c758c7d5d2cc89bc7a0a5e380.camel@pku.edu.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fault: Fix wrong signal when vsyscall fails with pkey From: Jiashuo Liang To: dave.hansen@intel.com Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, liangjs@pku.edu.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:58:25 +0800 In-Reply-To: <15721c9c-3030-2e4e-8e34-9f18afe8d171@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: 54FpogBHT+OxIBNh_6YuAg--.56139S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYg7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kI c2xKxwCY02Avz4vE14v_twCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvE74AGY7Cv6cx26w4UJr 1UMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xv wVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjx v20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267 AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUjg18DUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: isqqijqrtqmio6sn3hxhgxhubq/1tbiAwERBVPy7sZO2gATsY Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 07:02 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 7/28/21 11:24 PM, Jiashuo Liang wrote: >> I agree that using ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY is better. I think I am supposed to >> send a patch v2 for the update? > > Yes, please. The patch v2 is here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210730030152.249106-1-liangjs@pku.edu.cn/ Would you please have a look?