From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB46C433FE for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA26F60F6E for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232910AbhJILc3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:32:29 -0400 Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.230]:56277 "EHLO new4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231526AbhJILc0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:32:26 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8EA580958; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:30:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap47 ([10.202.2.97]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 07:30:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=svenpeter.dev; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=yjaV+Aq620PMH7q1EGIlum03SV/o UJx+i3qPZXiQFDo=; b=TtbRWbUcBV+Pt/wwY/RcU/PWNZf/aE5l2kf3EqdnxHyI s/yjd8KH80LtAUZw+tZqwEIE4Zpnz4v3nwG35xb2ggpdkYpzfQBFvQQfO4aPh1lr sFbmnXX5WxwoSvpY0X59wJggzlhXTgS9vlHm5QADlFABxj1ayBvSJxKBIXH6sg7E gLndLhRj6vPqQfZA1lDNnEEGWiD6ljmj2wjbglk4hT8niJ57x0Sjtyi1vELsXF5u yKPsqXK2Xp5YB3bKdaAbkD+sn9lOmyOSzmiOF/kp64QyZMJpY3lmlQHsWwE5qqaE E0g8V4wTs3iYwzsSfQjlRtnWziDpFN1a2p/jznFptA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=yjaV+A q620PMH7q1EGIlum03SV/oUJx+i3qPZXiQFDo=; b=UXA09pFYq8poDEewrBZO/U fECE+f2C6Yr12nJ2G/gFdQCCUQ4KMqaXRO+qm9jFR2IfTinRAcfUjm07sovsQGNy CWP74ZGzFogkt2FtxneokoR/u6NEeD6LaSg0b6sLirYQaOhGWzgpRyepJVu/GBHL SAjP8dhjoMqBPXgm6PVcU2vzuGReKr/PXEBtVrVN4ne4eaLYeZ5oiLVOQGR9NGux +zjSmlDpr87cAj9Ad4ZVrCrQGzbyY4nyQ9pLvVCJh+4h3q+lUBMvtXV/JjN1lUhD m/SOwHsRjBtQEV4ep/hEn62GLicp6xSgGRyEc8xRizkzXDSKz2bGbid6pORLf4+Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddtvddgfeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfuvhgv nhcurfgvthgvrhdfuceoshhvvghnsehsvhgvnhhpvghtvghrrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefgieegieffuefhtedtjefgteejteefleefgfefgfdvvddtgffhffduhedv feekffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hsvhgvnhesshhvvghnphgvthgvrhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3FA6D2740061; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 07:30:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1331-g5ae342296a-fm-20211005.001-g5ae34229 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <2f0c7001-475e-4790-b90d-a6d9e1341563@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20211008163532.75569-1-sven@svenpeter.dev> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 13:30:09 +0200 From: "Sven Peter" To: "Wolfram Sang" Cc: "Michael Ellerman" , "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" , "Paul Mackerras" , "Olof Johansson" , "Christian Zigotzky" , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Hector Martin" , "Mohamed Mediouni" , "Stan Skowronek" , "Mark Kettenis" , "Alyssa Rosenzweig" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, at 12:10, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I still don't have access to any old PASemi hardware but the changes from >> v1 are pretty small and I expect them to still work. Would still be nice >> if someone with access to such hardware could give this a quick test. > > Looks good to me. I will wait a few more days so that people can report > their tests. But it will be in the next merge window. Sounds great, thanks! Sven