From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754664AbYEGNUK (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 09:20:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750898AbYEGNTy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 09:19:54 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.227]:23177 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833AbYEGNTx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 09:19:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=PVuLpK0v6jIwj0ZQupEBqqLpGxgYeuxNxY/IeIidE4YXqTwHOAPE6oftjLerI4fz0CC2AgibssgelNzYQhl2RgvaKdbyyAncAlRTT1NCxkMxs1AT0oSeqRKVush4oIXHiaOnB665nPil+Ut1vVRDbkyi+2vlhnZWP/MWY+Je6NU= Message-ID: <2f11576a0805070619x11c462fdpbee1b652a83d7071@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 22:19:51 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" To: Nadia.Derbey@bull.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Scalability requirements for sysv ipc - v3 Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lnxninja@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <20080507113553.395937000@bull.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080507113553.395937000@bull.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4af56b5ba5b531f1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi nice improvement. but... > 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 2.6.25-rc3-mm1+ 2.6.25-mm1 Patched 2.6.25-mm1 > 1 1168441 1064021 876000 947488 > 2 1094264 921059 1549592 1730685 > 3 2082520 1738165 1694370 2324880 > 4 2079929 1695521 404553 2400408 > 5 2898758 406566 391283 3246580 > 6 2921417 261275 263249 3752148 > 7 3308761 126056 191742 4243142 > 8 3329456 100129 141722 4275780 > > 1st column: stock 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 > 2nd column: 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 + ipc patches (store ipcs into idrs) > 3nd column: stock 2.6.25-mm1 > 4th column: 2.6.25-mm1 + this pacth series. this result is slightly odd. similar to 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 and patched-2.6.25-mm1 similar to 2.6.25-mm1 and 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 but not similar to 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 and patched-2.6.25-rc3-mm1 not similar to 2.6.25-mm1 and patched-2.6.25-mm1 Is patched-2.6.25-rc3-mm1 and patched-2.6.25-mm1 applied the same patch? or I misunderstand how to see your chart?