From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDB769DE4; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708435122; cv=none; b=ImQOWAK41kWZsi/mUBCsM9THR7A652LPsUEJ2Kud508dNoqePc5ZEzYXtZrGpS34LAhwQZelz6QZgWkW+7m1aGFFH2WzUh6SvE2IuI++rYT9IyEweVCDS7w6MtDyv8bUP3UCgzlHOl4fQIYU81qw7DCYOQdUdPDesmValehdTrg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708435122; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UV/cpuRtRlaCri5lx4C7nu174G6nc2pEi2+tO4UB9kI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K37vF0n78ZqtNQAEdGazBeR/sFW0TYh+CoA7Si8f7gamKJDfOHaqUkrtu35Y7wwNhntPehIU9Yj4MmcEFjU7iFIPXZ+cbwOgUzgNbxfoNWu/13WT5ThWyoG8bMPWbcpVKKLgcmHHkLxtTT4q/3aIPC108wXnY0NchUuPKT4v4sc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=SK62GqNJ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=UAJcSX72; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="SK62GqNJ"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="UAJcSX72" Received: from blackpad (unknown [10.100.12.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D7B21DFD; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:18:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1708435117; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UV/cpuRtRlaCri5lx4C7nu174G6nc2pEi2+tO4UB9kI=; b=SK62GqNJCm6uU0Fa4MBbStGEj9foFB5OuS97qZTajQ5GavoJZZyohkDN2/S2NQ4yXptyja +DWu6c9EZjfxoWm7joQohVu1tY9NJfo4yCkD3dPnr278iRH2e99zbKlH6CMX2C20QfLQMX NrKAht9SApV9h66DG8DRA5nctCrCPZQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1708435116; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UV/cpuRtRlaCri5lx4C7nu174G6nc2pEi2+tO4UB9kI=; b=UAJcSX72EekECg5QLU6R/pfmVEasbhaK81mjqzyFjuZtSTHNNOuFX3oFrysF3XDF7t4Hw3 xBNEkenU+Q1qasUgYjsAgdpEN+7ET613iEuIYgSvuwSfaC84n/Pnp4XdLIh9KygOcLOYmi dAMbtPCRLqwXmIcEjM5XxxCnftZsVKo= Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:18:35 +0100 From: Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= To: "Huang, Kai" Cc: "hpa@zytor.com" , "tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "jarkko@kernel.org" , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "haitao.huang@linux.intel.com" , "Mehta, Sohil" , "tj@kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com" , "seanjc@google.com" , "anakrish@microsoft.com" , "Zhang, Bo" , "kristen@linux.intel.com" , "yangjie@microsoft.com" , "Li, Zhiquan1" , "chrisyan@microsoft.com" Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v9 08/15] x86/sgx: Implement EPC reclamation flows for cgroup Message-ID: <2ni2jychs6oe4ckplvbg7usrn7f4fsa2fi3ys6lrtyhbprpr7c@hokylc73dlwi> References: <20240205210638.157741-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> <20240205210638.157741-9-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nwjkzrolygogphrr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -4.24 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.24 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.com:s=susede1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.17)[-0.867]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[23]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[intel.com:email]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; BAYES_HAM(-1.37)[90.67%] X-Spam-Flag: NO --nwjkzrolygogphrr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:52:39AM +0000, "Huang, Kai" wrote: > I am not sure, but is it possible or legal for an ancestor to have less limit > than children? Why not? It is desired for proper hiearchical delegation and the tightest limit of ancestors applies (cf memory.max). Michal --nwjkzrolygogphrr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQQpEWyjXuwGT2dDBqAGvrMr/1gcjgUCZdSmqQAKCRAGvrMr/1gc jkKzAQDey//gJluYyxAmAACFkpQEQZs7Wq4LdwtcKfaXOfgwmwD8D4Tj0lWyyCDt aiID/E7nvQWorGQQc1J6VlBjBfMhagU= =CG6M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nwjkzrolygogphrr--