From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/2] riscv: extable: add new extable type EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO support
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 18:39:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <301cd27e-d003-584b-2eb0-8fa025348cff@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826081607.ci42sbffrmsfhk2w@kamzik>
在 2022/8/26 16:16, Andrew Jones 写道:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 02:44:48PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/8/25 19:06, Andrew Jones 写道:
>>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 03:20:25AM +0000, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>>>> Currently, The extable type EX_TYPE_UACCESS_ERR_ZERO is used by
>>>> __get/put_kernel_nofault(), but those helpers are not uaccess type, so we
>>>> add a new extable type EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO which can be used by
>>>> __get/put_kernel_no_fault().
>>>>
>>>> Only refactor code without any functional changes.
>>>
>>> This isn't quite true. __get/put_kernel_nofault now sets a different
>>> extable type (as the commit message says). But, nothing special seems
>>> to be done with that, so there's effectively no functional change. Can
>>> you please elaborate on the motivation for this change? Where will the
>>> KACCESS type need to be distinguished from the UACCESS type?
>>
>> The introduction of EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO does not change any function,
>> but makes a correct distinction in the actual type, indicating that there
>> are indeed some kaccess entries in extable. I think this optimization is
>> more clear and reasonable.
>
> Well, creating new types, just for new type sake, just bloats code.
>
>>
>> A few weeks ago, I did something similar on arm64[1]. I think this
>> optimization can also be used on riscv.
>>
>> We can do some features that are used on uaccss but not applicable on
>> kaccess in the future[2].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220621072638.1273594-2-tongtiangen@huawei.com/
>> [2]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220812070557.1028499-4-tongtiangen@huawei.com/
>>
>
> This is part of the information, but I had already found this. What's
> still missing to me are the riscv patches, or at least a riscv plan, for
> actually implementing something which requires kaccess and uaccess to have
> distinct types.
>
> Thanks,
> drew
At present, there is no such plan on riscv, because it is rely on
hardware support.
I think this patch can be merged as a small code optimization and
without any function change.
Thanks,
Tong.
>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-27 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 3:20 [PATCH -next v2 0/2]riscv: some refactorings realted to uaccess and extable Tong Tiangen
2022-08-15 3:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: uaccess: rename __get/put_user_nocheck to __get/put_mem_nocheck Tong Tiangen
2022-08-25 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-26 6:33 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26 7:43 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-27 10:39 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26 9:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-27 10:43 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-27 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-29 1:26 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-15 3:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/2] riscv: extable: add new extable type EX_TYPE_KACCESS_ERR_ZERO support Tong Tiangen
2022-08-25 11:06 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-26 6:44 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-26 8:16 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-27 10:39 ` Tong Tiangen [this message]
2022-09-21 20:25 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-21 12:23 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-08-24 6:31 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/2]riscv: some refactorings realted to uaccess and extable Tong Tiangen
2022-08-24 16:49 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-08-25 3:04 ` Tong Tiangen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=301cd27e-d003-584b-2eb0-8fa025348cff@huawei.com \
--to=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
--cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).