From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078C1C432C0 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A175B20859 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=chronox.de header.i=@chronox.de header.b="N7qyLRPP" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726085AbfKQMRd (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:17:33 -0500 Received: from mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.169]:32966 "EHLO mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726037AbfKQMRd (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 07:17:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1573993051; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=chronox.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=bCbsv9teHF57DwmEXM3joJCcJL2jsW51I59cUFXI/lI=; b=N7qyLRPPKqheFEdi1f25OoQrsvSBIZ3wfMA9xkyNvsjZfQ3/hY6/TRqoi3Ve70TgzI ML4G9Dr/OFKYud7rfpUaMCOQp/2VSnkKZZpZGMjQbFMuS+EWDSJAiLfUJU9TSsyuvGEJ fxRF0uZmFc13oiWKKKPLTR05+K2vZFzi979OEG2SY9kAiPh4OVhNqeP7E8e8y3yYPbQx 7yMl5N+rL8Nz4TSUrP+lppJ587fQqgI/A0TS/4XcZzxvYzWjJGCfRuokBE4TX/jdbiBU LJAcZ6K0MaF5TUT2sv7/nK/bpTWJeblH5SbwQtfHoRCQuHrfAMXgM3FLdsQ9g50zvoaX gIOQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2ERcEykfu11Y98lp/T7+hdri+uKZK8TKWEqNyiHySGSa9k9xmwdNnzHHXDbIvSfb0y2" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from positron.chronox.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.29.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id N09a57vAHCGJVZk (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:16:19 +0100 (CET) From: Stephan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Willy Tarreau , Matthew Garrett , Vito Caputo , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Ray Strode , William Jon McCann , zhangjs , Andy Lutomirski , Florian Weimer , Lennart Poettering , Nicolai Stange , "Peter, Matthias" , Marcelo Henrique Cerri , Roman Drahtmueller , Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v25 03/12] LRNG - /proc interface Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 13:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <3043322.Kq9igzfA0K@positron.chronox.de> In-Reply-To: <4EB89769-7A2C-4A03-A832-9A0539DD3336@amacapital.net> References: <2476454.l8LQlgn7Hv@positron.chronox.de> <4EB89769-7A2C-4A03-A832-9A0539DD3336@amacapital.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Samstag, 16. November 2019, 17:39:40 CET schrieb Andy Lutomirski: Hi Andy, > > On Nov 16, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Stephan M=C3=BCller = wrote: > >=20 > > =EF=BB=BFThe LRNG /proc interface provides the same files as the legacy > > /dev/random. These files behave identically. Yet, all files are > > documented at [1]. >=20 > Why? I am not sure here: are you referring to the documentation? Or the one=20 additional file? If it is the documentation, do you want me to add it to the patch descripti= on?=20 I initially did not add it as these files were present and seemingly known= =20 what they provide. But I would add that documentation to the patch descript= ion=20 if this is desired. If it is the additional file, should I move it to another place like a sysf= s=20 interface? Thank you. Ciao Stephan