On 10/13/21 5:45 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>
>>
>> In conclusion, it'd be good to have validity conditions separate from
>> transition conditions (since hotplug transition can't be rejected) and
>> perhaps treat administrative changes from an ancestor equally as a
>> hotplug.
>
> I am trying to make the result of changing "cpuset.cpus" as close to 
> hotplug as possible but there are cases where the "cpuset.cpus" change 
> is prohibited but hotplug can still happen to remove the cpu.
>
> Hope this will help to clarify the current design.
>
BTW, the attached file is the current draft of cpuset.cpus.partition 
document.

Cheers,
Longman