From: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Sander Vanheule" <sander@svanheule.net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30d8882efedea697da20c27563050008d1569b9e.1660068429.git.sander@svanheule.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1660068429.git.sander@svanheule.net>
cpu_possible_mask is not necessarily completely filled. That means
running a check on cpumask_full() doesn't make sense, so drop the test.
Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/
Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644
--- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all;
static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
{
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 18:08 [PATCH v1 0/5] cpumask: KUnit test suite fixes and improvements Sander Vanheule
2022-08-09 18:08 ` Sander Vanheule [this message]
2022-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test Maíra Canal
2022-08-10 8:18 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-10 4:06 ` David Gow
2022-08-10 8:45 ` Sander Vanheule
2022-08-10 10:51 ` David Gow
2022-08-09 18:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] lib/test_cpumask: fix cpu_possible_mask last test Sander Vanheule
2022-08-09 22:27 ` Maíra Canal
2022-08-10 4:06 ` David Gow
2022-08-09 18:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] lib/test_cpumask: follow KUnit style guidelines Sander Vanheule
2022-08-09 22:29 ` Maíra Canal
2022-08-10 4:06 ` David Gow
2022-08-09 18:08 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: log mask contents Sander Vanheule
2022-08-10 4:07 ` David Gow
2022-08-09 18:08 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] lib/cpumask_kunit: add tests file to MAINTAINERS Sander Vanheule
2022-08-10 4:06 ` David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30d8882efedea697da20c27563050008d1569b9e.1660068429.git.sander@svanheule.net \
--to=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).