From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:53:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:53:22 -0400 Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.100]:4559 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:53:11 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Richard Henderson cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 18 Aug 2001 18:27:56 MST." <20010818182756.A29533@twiddle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:53:20 +1000 Message-ID: <31011.998376800@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 18 Aug 2001 18:27:56 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: >On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 01:22:40PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: >> Using BFD is the only way I can handle all >> the relocation types, especially in cross compile mode. > >What the hell? You've got everything you need right there in >the obj subdirectory. Please don't bring libbfd back to life >in modutils. Cross compile mode. Nothing in modutils works unless it is running on the machine it was compiled for. As more modutil functions get pushed back into kbuild time, this is getting to be a problem. I could do all my own code for endianess and size differences between host and target, but why bother when bfd already does it for me?