linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] ext4: add basic fs-verity support
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 12:22:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3113392.yxf3e5PHVf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106012503.GB28490@gmail.com>

On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 6:55:03 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Chandan,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:13:14PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > On Friday, November 2, 2018 4:22:28 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > 
> > > Add basic fs-verity support to ext4.  fs-verity is a filesystem feature
> > > that enables transparent integrity protection and authentication of
> > > read-only files.  It uses a dm-verity like mechanism at the file level:
> > > a Merkle tree is used to verify any block in the file in log(filesize)
> > > time.  It is implemented mainly by helper functions in fs/verity/.
> > > See Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst for details.
> > > 
> > > This patch adds everything except the data verification hooks that will
> > > needed in ->readpages().
> > > 
> > > On ext4, enabling fs-verity on a file requires that the filesystem has
> > > the 'verity' feature, e.g. that it was formatted with
> > > 'mkfs.ext4 -O verity' or had 'tune2fs -O verity' run on it.
> > > This requires e2fsprogs 1.44.4-2 or later.
> > > 
> > > In ext4, we choose to retain the fs-verity metadata past the end of the
> > > file rather than trying to move it into an external inode xattr, since
> > > in practice keeping the metadata in-line actually results in the
> > > simplest and most efficient implementation.  One non-obvious advantage
> > > of keeping the verity metadata in-line is that when fs-verity is
> > > combined with fscrypt, the verity metadata naturally gets encrypted too;
> > > this is actually necessary because it contains hashes of the plaintext.
> > > 
> > > We also choose to keep the on-disk i_size equal to the original file
> > > size, in order to make the 'verity' feature a RO_COMPAT feature.  Thus,
> > > ext4 has to find the fsverity_footer by looking in the last extent.
> > > 
> > > Co-developed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/ext4/Kconfig | 20 +++++++++++
> > >  fs/ext4/ext4.h  | 20 ++++++++++-
> > >  fs/ext4/file.c  |  6 ++++
> > >  fs/ext4/inode.c |  8 +++++
> > >  fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 12 +++++++
> > >  fs/ext4/super.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  fs/ext4/sysfs.c |  6 ++++
> > >  7 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> > > index a453cc87082b5..5a76125ac0f8a 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> > > @@ -111,6 +111,26 @@ config EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
> > >  	default y
> > >  	depends on EXT4_ENCRYPTION
> > > 
> > > +config EXT4_FS_VERITY
> > > +	bool "Ext4 Verity"
> > > +	depends on EXT4_FS
> > > +	select FS_VERITY
> > > +	help
> > > +	  This option enables fs-verity for ext4.  fs-verity is the
> > > +	  dm-verity mechanism implemented at the file level.  Userspace
> > > +	  can append a Merkle tree (hash tree) to a file, then enable
> > > +	  fs-verity on the file.  ext4 will then transparently verify
> > > +	  any data read from the file against the Merkle tree.  The file
> > > +	  is also made read-only.
> > > +
> > > +	  This serves as an integrity check, but the availability of the
> > > +	  Merkle tree root hash also allows efficiently supporting
> > > +	  various use cases where normally the whole file would need to
> > > +	  be hashed at once, such as auditing and authenticity
> > > +	  verification (appraisal).
> > > +
> > > +	  If unsure, say N.
> > > +
> > >  config EXT4_DEBUG
> > >  	bool "EXT4 debugging support"
> > >  	depends on EXT4_FS
> > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > > index 12f90d48ba613..e5475a629ed80 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> > >  #define __FS_HAS_ENCRYPTION IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION)
> > >  #include <linux/fscrypt.h>
> > > 
> > > +#define __FS_HAS_VERITY IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_VERITY)
> > > +#include <linux/fsverity.h>
> > > +
> > >  #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > > 
> > >  /* Until this gets included into linux/compiler-gcc.h */
> > > @@ -405,6 +408,7 @@ struct flex_groups {
> > >  #define EXT4_TOPDIR_FL			0x00020000 /* Top of directory hierarchies*/
> > >  #define EXT4_HUGE_FILE_FL               0x00040000 /* Set to each huge file */
> > >  #define EXT4_EXTENTS_FL			0x00080000 /* Inode uses extents */
> > > +#define EXT4_VERITY_FL			0x00100000 /* Verity protected inode */
> > >  #define EXT4_EA_INODE_FL	        0x00200000 /* Inode used for large EA */
> > >  #define EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL		0x00400000 /* Blocks allocated beyond EOF */
> > >  #define EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL		0x10000000 /* Inode has inline data. */
> > > @@ -472,6 +476,7 @@ enum {
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_TOPDIR	= 17,	/* Top of directory hierarchies*/
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_HUGE_FILE	= 18,	/* Set to each huge file */
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS	= 19,	/* Inode uses extents */
> > > +	EXT4_INODE_VERITY	= 20,	/* Verity protected inode */
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_EA_INODE	= 21,	/* Inode used for large EA */
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_EOFBLOCKS	= 22,	/* Blocks allocated beyond EOF */
> > >  	EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA	= 28,	/* Data in inode. */
> > > @@ -517,6 +522,7 @@ static inline void ext4_check_flag_values(void)
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(TOPDIR);
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(HUGE_FILE);
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(EXTENTS);
> > > +	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(VERITY);
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(EA_INODE);
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(EOFBLOCKS);
> > >  	CHECK_FLAG_VALUE(INLINE_DATA);
> > > @@ -1654,6 +1660,7 @@ static inline void ext4_clear_state_flags(struct ext4_inode_info *ei)
> > >  #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM	0x0400
> > >  #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_READONLY		0x1000
> > >  #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT		0x2000
> > > +#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_VERITY		0x8000
> > > 
> > >  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_COMPRESSION	0x0001
> > >  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE		0x0002
> > > @@ -1742,6 +1749,7 @@ EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(bigalloc,		BIGALLOC)
> > >  EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(metadata_csum,	METADATA_CSUM)
> > >  EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(readonly,		READONLY)
> > >  EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(project,		PROJECT)
> > > +EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(verity,		VERITY)
> > > 
> > >  EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FUNCS(compression,	COMPRESSION)
> > >  EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FUNCS(filetype,		FILETYPE)
> > > @@ -1797,7 +1805,8 @@ EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FUNCS(encrypt,		ENCRYPT)
> > >  					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC |\
> > >  					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM|\
> > >  					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA |\
> > > -					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT)
> > > +					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT |\
> > > +					 EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_VERITY)
> > > 
> > >  #define EXTN_FEATURE_FUNCS(ver) \
> > >  static inline bool ext4_has_unknown_ext##ver##_compat_features(struct super_block *sb) \
> > > @@ -2293,6 +2302,15 @@ static inline bool ext4_encrypted_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > >  	return ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT);
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > +static inline bool ext4_verity_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_VERITY
> > > +	return ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_VERITY);
> > > +#else
> > > +	return false;
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > Can you please explain as to why we check for the presence of
> > EXT4_INODE_VERITY flag only when fsverity is enabled during kernel build?
> > 
> 
> Good question, this might not be the best approach actually; I think this was
> originally copied from the f2fs version.  It does reduce the overhead introduced
> by the fs-verity changes in the !CONFIG_EXT4_FS_VERITY case.  But it will allow
> opening verity files, even for writing which will corrupt them.
> 
> Probably we should make ext4_verity_inode() work regardless of
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_VERITY, so open(), truncate(), etc. will fail with EOPNOTSUPP on
> verity files when !CONFIG_EXT4_FS_VERITY, like how ext4 encryption works.
> 

Yes, I agree with what you say. I have followed the above explained logic when
implementing S_VERITY and IS_VERITY() for Ext4 and will extend that to F2FS as 
well.

-- 
chandan


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-06  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01 22:52 [PATCH v2 00/12] fs-verity: read-only file-based authenticity protection Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] fs-verity: add a documentation file Eric Biggers
2018-12-12  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-12 20:26     ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-13 20:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-14  4:48         ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-17 16:49           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 18:32             ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-19  7:09               ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 20:00           ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-19  0:16             ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-19  2:19               ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-19 19:30                 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-19 21:35                   ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-20 22:01                     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-21  7:04                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-21 10:06                         ` Richard Weinberger
2018-12-21 15:47                         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-21 15:53                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-21 16:28                             ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-21 16:34                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-21 19:13                           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-22  4:17                             ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-22 22:47                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-23  4:34                                 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-23  4:10                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-23  4:45                                 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-01-04 20:41                                   ` Daniel Colascione
2018-12-19  7:14               ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-19  7:11             ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]               ` <CAHk-=wiB8vGbje+NgNkMZupHsZ_cqg6YEBV+ZXSF4wnywFLRHQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-12-19  7:19                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-14  5:17         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-14  5:39           ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-17 16:52           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-17 19:15             ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-21 16:11   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] fs-verity: add setup code, UAPI, and Kconfig Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] fs-verity: add MAINTAINERS file entry Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] fs-verity: add data verification hooks for ->readpages() Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] fs-verity: implement FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] fs-verity: implement FS_IOC_MEASURE_VERITY ioctl Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] fs-verity: add SHA-512 support Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] fs-verity: add CRC-32C support Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] fs-verity: support builtin file signatures Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ext4: add basic fs-verity support Eric Biggers
2018-11-02  9:43   ` Chandan Rajendra
2018-11-06  1:25     ` Eric Biggers
2018-11-06  6:52       ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2018-11-05 21:05   ` Andreas Dilger
2018-11-06  1:11     ` Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: add fs-verity read support Eric Biggers
2018-11-01 22:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] f2fs: fs-verity support Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3113392.yxf3e5PHVf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=victorhsieh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).