From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752089AbeDVNge (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 09:36:34 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:50216 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751513AbeDVNgc (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Apr 2018 09:36:32 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <152422770230.23067.14348897715991489250.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel , Al Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Undo an overly zealous MS_RDONLY -> SB_RDONLY conversion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <31366.1524404190.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:36:30 +0100 Message-ID: <31367.1524404190@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > I guess they have the same value (1). How did you notice? Do you have > some patches that turn the kernel flags into a bitwise type? Or did > you just happen on it manually? I happened to be looking at that bit of code. They have the saame value for the moment, but this may not always remain so. David