LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / Atom feed
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
	fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] s390/zcrypt: Integrate ap_asm.h into include/asm/ap.h.
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:53:57 -0400
Message-ID: <31498420-ad49-7fb6-7d13-55513ca0e3d3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4251c5c4-6330-d391-f37c-c57dd268efe9@linux.ibm.com>

On 08/10/2018 05:37 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> On 10.08.2018 10:49, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:06:56 -0400
>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/09/2018 05:17 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>>>> On 09.08.2018 11:06, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>> On Wed,  8 Aug 2018 10:44:14 -0400
>>>>> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>> From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Move all the inline functions from the ap bus header
>>>>>> file ap_asm.h into the in-kernel api header file
>>>>>> arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h so that KVM can make use
>>>>>> of all the low level AP functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>>>> You should add your own s-o-b if you are sending on patches written by
>>>>> others (even if it does not matter in the end, when they are merged
>>>>> through a different path anyway.)
>>>>>   
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h     |  284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/ap_asm.h   |  261 ------------------------------------
>>>>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c   |   21 +---
>>>>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h   |    1 +
>>>>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/ap_card.c  |    1 -
>>>>>>    drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c |    1 -
>>>>>>    6 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 310 deletions(-)
>>>>>>    delete mode 100644 drivers/s390/crypto/ap_asm.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
>>>>>> index c1bedb4..046e044 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
>>>>>> @@ -47,6 +47,50 @@ struct ap_queue_status {
>>>>>>    };
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>    /**
>>>>>> + * ap_intructions_available() - Test if AP instructions are available.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * Returns 0 if the AP instructions are installed.
>>>>> Stumbled over this when I was looking at the usage in patch 7: if I see
>>>>> a function called '_available' return 0, I'd assume that whatever the
>>>>> function tests for is *not* available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather call this function ap_instructions_check_availability() (and
>>>>> keep the return code convention), or switch this to return 0 if not
>>>>> available and !0 if available?
>>>> Good catch, Cony you are right. I'll fix this to return 1 if AP instructions
>>>> are available and 0 if not. However, this patch will come via Martin's pipe
>>>> to the Linus Torwald kernel sources.
>>> Is your intent to simply indicate whether the AP instructions are
>>> available or
>>> not; or is the intention to indicate whether the AP instructions are
>>> available
>>> and if not, they why? In the former, then I agree that a boolean should be
>>> returned; however, if the case is the latter, then what you have is fine but
>>> maybe the function name should be changed as Connie suggests.
>> So, can this actually fail for any reason other than "instructions not
>> installed"? Even if it did, the end result is that the instructions are
>> not usable -- I don't think the "why" would be interesting at that
>> point.
> I can not think of any other reason why the PQAP(TAPQ) would fail
> other than the AP instructions are not available at all. However,
> the old implementation returned -ENODEV on failure and 0 on
> success. The new implementation now returns 1 for success
> and 0 for failure. This is just one of a couple of functions related
> to ap xxx available. I'll rework them all to return a boolean value
> soon.

How would you recommend I proceed given I have functions that call this
interface that check the rc and I've had to include your patches in
this series because of that dependence?

>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static inline int ap_instructions_available(void)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	register unsigned long reg0 asm ("0") = AP_MKQID(0, 0);
>>>>>> +	register unsigned long reg1 asm ("1") = -ENODEV;
>>>>>> +	register unsigned long reg2 asm ("2");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	asm volatile(
>>>>>> +		"   .long 0xb2af0000\n"		/* PQAP(TAPQ) */
>>>>>> +		"0: la    %0,0\n"
>>>>>> +		"1:\n"
>>>>>> +		EX_TABLE(0b, 1b)
>>>>>> +		: "+d" (reg1), "=d" (reg2)
>>>>>> +		: "d" (reg0)
>>>>>> +		: "cc");
>>>>>> +	return reg1;
>>>>>> +}



  reply index

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-08 14:44 [PATCH v8 00/22] vfio-ap: guest dedicated crypto adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 01/22] s390/zcrypt: Add ZAPQ inline function Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 02/22] s390/zcrypt: Review inline assembler constraints Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 03/22] s390/zcrypt: Show load of cards and queues in sysfs Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 04/22] s390/zcrypt: Integrate ap_asm.h into include/asm/ap.h Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  9:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-09  9:17     ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-08-09 13:45       ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-08-09 16:06       ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-10  8:49         ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-10  9:37           ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-08-10 15:53             ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2018-08-10 15:50           ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09 15:18     ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09 15:43       ` Heiko Carstens
2018-08-09 16:55         ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-13  9:24     ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-08-13  9:34       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 05/22] KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 06/22] KVM: s390: introduce and use KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 07/22] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  5:58   ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-10 16:13     ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  8:25   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-09 19:54     ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 08/22] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09 10:12   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/22] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09 11:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-09 16:27     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-10  8:59       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 10/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 11/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure domains Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 12/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure control domains Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 13/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interface to view matrix mdev matrix Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 14/22] KVM: s390: interfaces to clear CRYCB masks Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 15/22] s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 16/22] s390: vfio-ap: implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 17/22] s390: vfio-ap: zeroize the AP queues Tony Krowiak
2018-08-10  9:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-10 10:49     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-10 11:16       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-10 16:24         ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-13  6:57           ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 18/22] s390: vfio-ap: implement VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 19/22] KVM: s390: Clear Crypto Control Block when using vSIE Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  8:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-09  8:50     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-09  8:57     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 20/22] KVM: s390: Handling of Cypto control block in VSIE Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  6:20   ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-09  7:33     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 21/22] KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP virtualization Tony Krowiak
2018-08-09  8:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-09  8:34     ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-08-09 20:27     ` Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 14:44 ` [PATCH v8 22/22] s390: doc: detailed specifications " Tony Krowiak
2018-08-08 15:06 ` [PATCH v8 00/22] vfio-ap: guest dedicated crypto adapters Janosch Frank
2018-08-08 16:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-08-08 22:52   ` Tony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31498420-ad49-7fb6-7d13-55513ca0e3d3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox