From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262436AbVAJSnp (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:43:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262306AbVAJSkN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:40:13 -0500 Received: from mail.tyan.com ([66.122.195.4]:41741 "EHLO tyanweb.tyan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262301AbVAJShI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:37:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C943142307291394@TYANWEB> From: YhLu To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com Cc: Mikael Pettersson , ak@muc.de, Matt_Domsch@dell.com, discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: RE: 256 apic id for amd64 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:48:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James, I'm working on add amd dual core LinuxBIOS support to our MB. So I can change the apic id as I want. When I lift the apic id for CPUS, if the bsp apicid is changed to 0x10, the jiffies is not changing, So I have to leave to set BSP using apic id 0 in LinuxBIOS. And lifting others to use 0x11..... According to Andi, that would be one bug in kernel ..... Regards YH