Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] can: m_can: Add PM Runtime

[Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3328 bytes --]

On 01/04/2018 04:17 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday 03 January 2018 08:47 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 01/03/2018 04:06 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 03 January 2018 07:55 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> On 01/03/2018 01:39 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 02 January 2018 09:37 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/22/2017 02:31 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Add support for PM Runtime which is the new way to handle managing clocks.
>>>>>>> However, to avoid breaking SoCs not using PM_RUNTIME leave the old clk
>>>>>>> management approach in place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no PM_RUNTIME anymore since 464ed18ebdb6 ("PM: Eliminate
>>>>>> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME")
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok. Will change the commit message.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a look at the discussion: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9436507/ :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, I admit it would be nicer if drivers didn't have to worry about 
>>>>>>>> whether or not CONFIG_PM was enabled.  A slightly cleaner approach 
>>>>>>>> from the one outlined above would have the probe routine do this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	my_power_up(dev);
>>>>>>>> 	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>>>>>>>> 	pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
>>>>>>>> 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>>>>
>>>>> This discussion seems to be about cases in which CONFIG_PM is not
>>>>> enabled. CONFIG_PM is always selected in the case of omap devices.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but in the commit message you state that you need to support
>>>> systems that don't have PM_RUNTIME enabled. The only mainline SoCs I see
>>>> is "arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi" so far. Please check if they select
>>>> CONFIG_PM, then we can make the driver much simpler.
>>>
>>> Actually the old clock management (for hclk which is the interface
>>> clock) is still required as mentioned in the cover letter. Will change
>>> the rather misleading description.
>>
>> Ok. So you can use the code as discussed on
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9436507/ ?
> 
> Looking at the kernel configuration, it seems like SAMA5D2 platform
> selects CONFIG_PM (Wenyou, please confirm). So, it seems like the only
> users of this driver always have CONFIG_PM enabled.
> 
> So I guess the best way is to maintain the current code for pm_runtime_*
> and move the clock enable/disable to pm_runtime callbacks.
> 
> Something like this:
> 
> m_can_runtime_resume()
> {
> 	clk_prepare_enable(cclk);
> 	clk_prepare_enable(hclk);
> }
> 
> m_can_runtime_suspend()
> {
> 	clk_disable_unprepare(cclk);
> 	clk_disable_unprepare(hclk);
> }
> 
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(m_can_runtime_suspend, m_can_runtime_resume, NULL)
> 
> static void m_can_start(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> 	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev)
> 	...
> }
> 
> static void m_can_stop(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> 	...
> 	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev)
> }
> 
> Does that sound okay? If yes, I will go work on the implementation.

ACK + error checking.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]