From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756037Ab3GBBUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:20:15 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:56547 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755648Ab3GBBUN (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:20:13 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jesse Barnes , Yinghai Lu , "Ronciak, John" , "Penner, Miles J" , Bruce Allan , Heikki Krogerus , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI: acpiphp: do not check for SLOT_ENABLED in enable_device() Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 03:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3216917.m2IEX2IHod@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.10.0-rc5+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130701183612.GJ9294@intel.com> References: <1372177330-28013-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1530651.ees8hXMYoR@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130701183612.GJ9294@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, July 01, 2013 09:36:13 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:01:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Given the fact that SLOT_ENABLED is only checked in acpiphp_enable_slot() > > > (after this patch) and that /sys/bus/pci/slots/*/power uses SLOT_POWEREDON > > > anyway, should we remove the whole flag? > > > > Sure, if it is not necessary any more, we should remove it. > > Well, there is one thing that changes due that. Once the flag is gone > userspace can do 'echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/*/power' several times and > the slot is always re-enumerated. > > If that is not acceptable we should probably move the SLOT_ENABLED check > closer to acpiphp_core:enable_device() and drop it from here, so that we > always re-enumerate on Bus Check event but userspace can only do enable > once (we still re-enumerate on Bus Check). Yes, that sounds like the right thing to do. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.