linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
	Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
	David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:05:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3252df44-5856-c1ed-174e-18748387cdd2@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0bd9204-1f76-aba3-b754-464e28763f59@molgen.mpg.de>



On 2022-04-21 03:17, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Logan,
> 
> 
> Thank you for these patches.
> 
> 
> Am 20.04.22 um 21:54 schrieb Logan Gunthorpe:
>> There are a few uses of an ugly ternary operator in raid5_make_request()
>> to check if a sector is a head of a reshape sector.
>>
>> Factor this out into a simple helper called ahead_of_reshape().
>>
>> This appears to fix the first bio_wouldblock_error() check which appears
>> to have comparison operators that didn't match the check below which
>> causes a schedule. Besides this, no functional changes intended.
> 
> If there is an error, could that be fixed in a separate commit, which
> could be applied to the stable series?

Yes, sure. Though, I'm not 100% sure there's an error or noticeable bug.
It's just that the logic didn't match and it made cleaning up the code
overly complicated.


> 
>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/md/raid5.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> index 7f7d1546b9ba..97b23c18402b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> @@ -5787,6 +5787,15 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev
>> *mddev, struct bio *bi)
>>       bio_endio(bi);
>>   }
>>   +static bool ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector,
>> +                 sector_t reshape_sector)
>> +{
>> +    if (mddev->reshape_backwards)
>> +        return sector < reshape_sector;
>> +    else
>> +        return sector >= reshape_sector;
> 
> I like the ternary operator. ;-)
> 
>     return mddev->reshape_backwards ? (return sector < reshape_sector) :
> (sector >= reshape_sector)
> 
> Sorry, does not matter.

Yeah, I think plenty of people do not, though; it's harder to read with
the long line and awkward to wrap.

> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>

Thanks,

Logan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20 19:54 [PATCH v2 00/12] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-21  9:17   ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-21 16:05     ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-21 23:33       ` Wol
2022-04-27  1:28   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:07     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:49       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-28 15:44         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-29  0:24           ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] md/raid5: Refactor raid5_make_request loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:32   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:08     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:16       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] md/raid5: Move stripe_add_to_batch_list() call out of add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-27  1:33   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] md/raid5: Move common stripe count increment code into __find_stripe() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:33   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] md/raid5: Factor out helper from raid5_make_request() loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] md/raid5: Drop the do_prepare flag in raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:11   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] md/raid5: Move read_seqcount_begin() into make_stripe_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:13   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] md/raid5: Refactor for loop in raid5_make_request() into while loop Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] md/raid5: Keep a reference to last stripe_head for batch Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:36   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 23:27     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] md/raid5: Refactor add_stripe_bio() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] md/raid5: Check all disks in a stripe_head for reshape progress Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  1:53   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:11     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-20 19:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] md/raid5: Pivot raid5_make_request() Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-21  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-21 15:54     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-27  2:06   ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-27 16:18     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-28  1:32       ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-21  8:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention Xiao Ni
2022-04-21 16:02   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-24  8:00     ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-25 15:39       ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-25 16:12         ` Xiao Ni
2022-04-28 21:22           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-29  0:49             ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-29 16:01               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-30  1:44                 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-24  7:53 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-04-25 15:37   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-04-25 23:07 ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3252df44-5856-c1ed-174e-18748387cdd2@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=David.Sloan@eideticom.com \
    --cc=Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).