From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:07:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33127d22-5199-d4f2-8ee6-8b5a0491d40e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtA7LVe0wccghiQbRArfZZFz7xZwV3dsoQ_Jcdr4swVWZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/02/2020 13:22, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Don't know if it's only me but I can't find patches 9-11 on mailing list
>
Same here, doesn't show up on lore either:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200212093654.4816-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net/#r
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 9:36 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched/fair: Allow a small load imbalance between low utilisation SD_NUMA domains Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core() Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched/fair: Allow a per-CPU kthread waking a task to stack on the same CPU, to fix XFS performance regression Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched/numa: Trace when no candidate CPU was found on the preferred node Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched/numa: Distinguish between the different task_numa_migrate failure cases Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:59 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched/numa: Prefer using an idle cpu as a migration target instead of comparing tasks Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched/numa: Find an alternative idle CPU if the CPU is part of an active NUMA balance Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 9:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched/numa: Bias swapping tasks based on their preferred node Mel Gorman
2020-02-13 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-13 11:18 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 13:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer Vincent Guittot
2020-02-12 14:07 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-02-12 15:48 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 16:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-12 15:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched/fair: Split out helper to adjust imbalances between domains Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer for moving between domains with spare capacity Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer for moving between overloaded domains Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20200214041232.18904-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-02-14 7:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched/numa: Bias swapping tasks based on their preferred node Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33127d22-5199-d4f2-8ee6-8b5a0491d40e@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).