From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B06C18E5B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA2320776 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732759AbgDAPIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:08:10 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:33124 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732687AbgDAPIK (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:08:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 031F4I9S075063; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 11:07:43 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 303uj4gujr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 11:07:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 031F16GH031835; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:07:42 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 301x76t8nu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:07:42 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 031F7fWh45613404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:07:41 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60210AE05C; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:07:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE29AE060; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:07:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LeoBras (unknown [9.85.228.30]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:07:37 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <33333c2ffe9fedbee252a1731d7c10cd3308252b.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/kernel: Enables memory hot-remove after reboot on pseries guests From: Leonardo Bras To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nathan Fontenot , Thomas Gleixner , Michael Anderson , Mike Rapoport , Claudio Carvalho , Hari Bathini , Christophe Leroy , bharata.rao@in.ibm.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:07:33 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20200305233231.174082-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200305233231.174082-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VynV9rUX+88/vxShdVMp" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-01_01:2020-03-31,2020-03-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=829 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004010130 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-VynV9rUX+88/vxShdVMp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 20:32 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > --- > The new flag was already proposed on Power Architecture documentation, > and it's waiting for approval. >=20 > I would like to get your comments on this change, but it's still not > ready for being merged. New flag got approved on the documentation. Please review this patch. --=-VynV9rUX+88/vxShdVMp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEMdeUgIzgjf6YmUyOlQYWtz9SttQFAl6ErjUACgkQlQYWtz9S ttTBKhAAlHs4fzgLuSqNlQADyKsBH7BIUd0lzkGIYBuyBmswiNXSgvCNjT6Dm5MX o2xXMdLwhSyg4B82Vjt3ykc5OBqphBtF4X9FBGAag+D0FsodTkmSRIJZgM6uwbn+ RSboIpXmches0B9OLGCW286RWU1aVO2hIZqhWLgORNFsnH8zzYuYHDHhaJ8gXiOA CrNn0IpTNtdjjsMkxtzoh3FTEgsafcQWmicMhPk3GK6SvF8BkB8xTyADqQgHV95r 5zscp72pYhEO86m1ZEJjUCEkoL4bLlrONeVDD5ZRAG95+Okf5Q6wYDC42rCYoHhH CqMiLcfnBfow1DExc8nv8yIYGIaMitR2n27sGgzgg6l4CgYrZvHsMyQoxT5umXM7 7sFOsVNND4hnMGs5WEUm5SuSn03tYaV6e59WI8ihiqOk2wsuIqmtPxP7XyA3Aw7d ocKqN9hajO2ylltq7NeTm1xitlWYShX+BZ0q9Z4/7iyk0Z57QRAi6GBHf+/jmCUc o68jcF0CIVLZFK/FyXcNMV0ndd2g0Q5OqtJLTbujtV494clWOzTa4zYB/h0QnS49 MSElbBVgbD7JheuCSoHKj5KRL0QPHKAzmGydngqhJiV7ngC3CEbX1ddW5+euZuSb Hxrrbj9KUDsNm9UoqX11MMzomkjYWZxQzJEcVv1eUXdm4t0NVBs= =AaxG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VynV9rUX+88/vxShdVMp--