From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328A4C5CFE7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DA320A8B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1DA320A8B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389406AbeGJSnk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:43:40 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51808 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389003AbeGJSdm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:33:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3549F16A3; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.23]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A66E93F589; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Robin Murphy To: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] of/device: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:17:18 +0100 Message-Id: <346c004b599fb77a2006a4eeb992b30feb06fce5.1531239284.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1.dirty In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When an explicit DMA limit is described by firmware, we need to remember it regardless of how drivers might subsequently update their devices' masks. The new bus_dma_mask field does that. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy --- drivers/of/device.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c index 33d85511d790..0d39633e8545 100644 --- a/drivers/of/device.c +++ b/drivers/of/device.c @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ int of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np, bool force_dma) * set by the driver. */ mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(dma_addr + size - 1) + 1); + dev->bus_dma_mask = mask; dev->coherent_dma_mask &= mask; *dev->dma_mask &= mask; -- 2.17.1.dirty