From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752316Ab2ATNiQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:38:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:51431 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625Ab2ATNiO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:38:14 -0500 From: Pali =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= To: Grazvydas Ignotas Cc: Anton Vorontsov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bq27x00_battery status report issue Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:38:08 +0100 Message-ID: <3483637.Dq3EujObBh@pali> User-Agent: KMail/4.8 rc2 (Linux/3.2.0-9-generic; KDE/4.7.97; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <10055259.ygSgKeUM8f@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4961382.vFNTIT0ppH"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart4961382.vFNTIT0ppH Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Friday 20 January 2012 13:02:46 Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Pali Roh=E1r = wrote: > > Now I do not have device with bq27500 chip for testing. I read data= sheet > > again and I think that your interpretation may be correct. Can you = write > > patch for this problem and test it? >=20 > What about just reverting 270968c0984ae instead? I think my patch > would look almost exactly like that.. Ok, then revert this commit. --=20 Pali Roh=E1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart4961382.vFNTIT0ppH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk8ZbkAACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1IT6ACeKw1JMeZJOHIVeXj8QTfe1WJZ OSMAoMUi/Vmu3rodyu3+vXPGJcivYwoo =eBHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4961382.vFNTIT0ppH--