From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755275AbeDWNiy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:38:54 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:40962 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755185AbeDWNiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 09:38:52 -0400 Message-ID: <34cd09b249cc302d7f2867d0d663321021328cbf.camel@collabora.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: do not print error when get supply and clk defer. From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Ulf Hansson , Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: Myungjoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner , Linux PM , Derek Basehore , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Doug Anderson , groek@google.com, kernel@collabora.com, Lin Huang , Chanwoo Choi Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:37:28 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20180419104019.24406-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <20180419104019.24406-6-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 12:44 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 19 April 2018 at 12:40, Enric Balletbo i Serra > wrote: > > From: Lin Huang > > > > We just return -EPROBE_DEFER error code to caller and do not > > print error message when try to get center logic regulator > > and DMC clock defer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > > --- > > > > drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c > > index 44a379657cd5..5bfca028eaaf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c > > @@ -308,12 +308,18 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > data->vdd_center = devm_regulator_get(dev, "center"); > > if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center)) { > > + if (PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + > > dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n"); > > Doesn't the clock core already print an error message for this? > s/clock/regulator? > Maybe a better way is simply to drop the printing instead of trying to > have a special case for it? > I don't think so. If you remove this print you: i) might get a print from the core, or ii) maybe not because of some path without a print. And even if you do get an error, it might not relate exactly to the driver that requested the resource, because you might be printing via pr_xxx, from a context without a struct dev to use dev_xxx. > > return PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center); > > } > > > > data->dmc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "dmc_clk"); > > if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk)) { > > + if (PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > + > > dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n"); > > return PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk); > > }; > > -- > > 2.17.0 > > > > Kind regards > Uffe >