From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F921ECE562 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6DA2146D for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:01:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB6DA2146D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730839AbeISLhV (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:37:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51748 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726827AbeISLhV (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:37:21 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0E7330842A8; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-123-84.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D07104255A; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20180919094847.2103082b@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20180919094847.2103082b@canb.auug.org.au> <20180919073826.02370812@canb.auug.org.au> <20180910133525.28c5dd20@canb.auug.org.au> <15925.1537309041@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3564.1537336860.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:01:00 +0100 Message-ID: <3565.1537336860@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I think the problem is that I haven't allocated system call numbers for > > any arches other than x86 - even the x86 syscall numbers are provisional > > until the patchset is taken upstream. I'm not sure of the best way to > > deal with this - make the samples dependent on the X86 arch? > > But the sample programs are built with HOSTCC, so you can't depend on > ARCH (since I, for one, am cross compiling). Maybe SUBARCH. Better > would be to use either Kconfig's shell primitive or some make magic to > figure out if the syscall number define's are defined. I meant put the dependency in the Kconfig. David