Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] CAN: Add support for CAN in AM65,J721e and AM64

[Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>]

Hi,

On 02/08/21 6:15 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:40-20210726, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>> The following series of patches add support for CAN in SoC's AM65, J721e
>> and AM64.
>>
>> This patch series is dependent on [1] and [2] and I have requested for an
>> immutable tag from the Marc Kleine-Budde(maintainer of net tree).
>>
>> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1423048/
>> [2] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg08108.html
>>
>> changes since v1 -
>> - changed the message ram configuration to use the maximum value
>>   in each field, for better performance.
>>
>> Aswath Govindraju (3):
>>   arm64: dts: ti: am654-base-board: Disable mcan nodes
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add support for MCAN
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add support for main domain mcan
>>     nodes in EVM and disable them on SK
>>
>> Faiz Abbas (3):
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add Support for MCAN
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add support for MCAN nodes
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support for mcu_mcan
>>     nodes
> 
> I noticed in my checkup: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zSk39M943N/
> warnings with dtbs_check, I think the bindings need a little more help
> here (please also notice the iot platform warnings getting introduced).
> 

Jan,

Can you please point me to the schematics for iot platform? Also, is CAN
subsystem brought out on the iot platform boards?

> Since we are still working on the bindings[1], lets clean that up
> before we consider the dts addition. I suspect we need to cook this
> more towards the next cycle.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1470806/
> 

Nishanth,

Sorry for not taking of this earlier. I'll try to get everything ready
for next release.

Thanks,
Aswath