From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752322AbdA2Ubg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:31:36 -0500
Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:45718 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751948AbdA2UbT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:31:19 -0500
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
        Huang Tao <huangtao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] clocksource/drivers/rockchip_timer: split bc_timer into rk_timer and rk_clock_event_device
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:30:13 +0100
Message-ID: <3616490.5RPja2j5kp@phil>
User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.8.0-2-amd64; KDE/5.27.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <14EAE124-D504-4480-A6D4-EB7EFFC3C561@gmail.com>
References: <1485260203-14216-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <3890508.0j97LNriXL@diego> <14EAE124-D504-4480-A6D4-EB7EFFC3C561@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Alexander,

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2017, 18:16:20 CET schrieb Alexander Kochetkov:
> > 24 янв. 2017 г., в 18:02, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> написал(а):
> > 
> > Please don't add Reviewed-by tags without explicit mention of them by
> > reviewers. (Also it's spelled wrong).
> > 
> > I haven't looked that deeply into the driver itself and the changes made
> > to
> > feel comfortable with a "Reviewed-by".
> 
> Than I posted another linux code I was asked to add such tags (and others)
> to add credits to people.
> 
> Sorry for that.

no problem. In general people reviewing patches will respond to the patch with 
tags they are comfortable with being added. And a Reviewed-by is a pretty 
strong tag, indicating that some thought went into reviewing a specific patch, 
which I hadn't done with my cursory glance at the time :-)

Heiko