From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"io-uring@vger.kernel.org" <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/13] fs/userfaultfd: support read_iter to use io_uring
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:23:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3634A0BA-888F-445B-84A2-D7F7C957FFA8@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcf0ca71-c3e3-a813-b04f-d3e86bcddd48@kernel.dk>
> On Nov 30, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 11/28/20 5:45 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
>>
>> iouring with userfaultfd cannot currently be used fixed buffers since
>> userfaultfd does not provide read_iter(). This is required to allow
>> asynchronous (queued) reads from userfaultfd.
>>
>> To support async-reads of userfaultfd provide read_iter() instead of
>> read().
>>
>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
>> ---
>> fs/userfaultfd.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
>> index b6a04e526025..6333b4632742 100644
>> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
>> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
>> @@ -1195,9 +1195,9 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t userfaultfd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>> - size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +static ssize_t userfaultfd_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>> {
>> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
>> struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
>> ssize_t _ret, ret = 0;
>> struct uffd_msg msg;
>> @@ -1207,16 +1207,18 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> for (;;) {
>> - if (count < sizeof(msg))
>> + if (iov_iter_count(to) < sizeof(msg))
>> return ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
>> _ret = userfaultfd_ctx_read(ctx, no_wait, &msg);
>
> 'no_wait' should be changed to factor in iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT as well,
> not just f_flags & O_NONBLOCK.
>
> I didn't check your write_iter, but if appropriate, that should do that
> too.
Thanks, I completely missed this point and will fix it in v1 (if I get
a positive feedback on the rest from the userfaultfd people).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-29 0:45 [RFC PATCH 00/13] fs/userfaultfd: support iouring and polling Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] fs/userfaultfd: fix wrong error code on WP & !VM_MAYWRITE Nadav Amit
2020-12-01 21:22 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-12-21 19:01 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] fs/userfaultfd: fix wrong file usage with iouring Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] selftests/vm/userfaultfd: wake after copy failure Nadav Amit
2020-12-21 19:28 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-21 19:51 ` Nadav Amit
2020-12-21 20:52 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-21 20:54 ` Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] fs/userfaultfd: simplify locks in userfaultfd_ctx_read Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] fs/userfaultfd: introduce UFFD_FEATURE_POLL Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] iov_iter: support atomic copy_page_from_iter_iovec() Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] fs/userfaultfd: support read_iter to use io_uring Nadav Amit
2020-11-30 18:20 ` Jens Axboe
2020-11-30 19:23 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] fs/userfaultfd: complete reads asynchronously Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] fs/userfaultfd: use iov_iter for copy/zero Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] fs/userfaultfd: add write_iter() interface Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] fs/userfaultfd: complete write asynchronously Nadav Amit
2020-12-02 7:12 ` Nadav Amit
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] fs/userfaultfd: kmem-cache for wait-queue objects Nadav Amit
2020-11-30 19:51 ` Nadav Amit
2020-12-03 5:19 ` [fs/userfaultfd] fec9227821: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-11-29 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] selftests/vm/userfaultfd: iouring and polling tests Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3634A0BA-888F-445B-84A2-D7F7C957FFA8@vmware.com \
--to=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).