From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
To: Alifer Moraes <alifer.m@variscite.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, eran.m@variscite.com,
festevam@gmail.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux@rempel-privat.de,
pierluigi.p@variscite.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
shawnguo@kernel.org, gaopan <b54642@freescale.com>,
Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com>,
Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: (EXT) [PATCH] i2c: imx: add irqf_no_suspend
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:57:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3676803.kQq0lBPeGt@steina-w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220307143630.28697-1-alifer.m@variscite.com>
Hallo,
Am Montag, 7. März 2022, 15:36:30 CET schrieb Alifer Moraes:
> From: gaopan <b54642@freescale.com>
>
> The i2c irq is masked when pcie starts a i2c transfer process
> during noirq suspend stage. As a result, i2c transfer fails.
> To solve the problem, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is added to i2c bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Pan <b54642@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@mentor.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index 27f969b3dc07..fcc09a1e7f44 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -1478,7 +1478,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto rpm_disable;
>
> /* Request IRQ */
> - ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, i2c_imx_isr, NULL, IRQF_SHARED,
> + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, i2c_imx_isr, NULL,
> + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> pdev->name, i2c_imx);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq);
I stumbled across Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.rst which states:
> For this reason, using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and IRQF_SHARED at the
> same time should be avoided.
Given this IMHO at least a comment should be inserted why this is fine. I dont
have a full picture about the situation, but to me it seems there is a
reference missing, or why/how does some PCIe start some I2C transfer when the
controller is suspended already? Do I miss something?
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 14:36 [PATCH] i2c: imx: add irqf_no_suspend Alifer Moraes
2022-03-11 9:01 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-03-11 10:57 ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2022-05-21 10:24 ` (EXT) " Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3676803.kQq0lBPeGt@steina-w \
--to=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=B38611@freescale.com \
--cc=alifer.m@variscite.com \
--cc=b54642@freescale.com \
--cc=eran.m@variscite.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=pierluigi.p@variscite.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=vipul_kumar@mentor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).