From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752475AbXCQSXa (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:23:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752847AbXCQSXa (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:23:30 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:2792 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752475AbXCQSX3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:23:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=egw/CnfMtSH0fyzMtpYfJmeQP2x95qPj1JhBKNTQzPdYQbJzW5bMjCcwvItAch9vrTc0UxQ8LZH7O8ANDMhPj5ZrWVJhCSJMM3cEqUcmSyQoaPaUb00s+P5NnkESKz0Xhnzd6+lgqEx+f44j+dWcIlM3SPODq0Z9COhVGgumdQU= Message-ID: <367a23780703171123r142644baib0466ce6449d7c60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:23:28 +0100 From: "Kacper Wysocki" To: "Mike Galbraith" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31 Cc: "Gene Heskett" , "Al Boldi" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org, "Linus Torvalds" , "Nicholas Miell" In-Reply-To: <1174153022.7332.1.camel@Homer.simpson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200703042335.26785.a1426z@gawab.com> <200703170805.59619.gene.heskett@gmail.com> <1174138590.7614.6.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <200703171303.42795.gene.heskett@gmail.com> <1174153022.7332.1.camel@Homer.simpson.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ba62755e34ce5913 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 13:03 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 17 March 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > [...] > > >Xorg is using 50% cpu because I'm asking it to. > > > > What advantage is that giving you? > > It's a test scenario. Read the thread please, I really don't want to > repeat myself endlessly. I've been following "this thread" since Con's .31 announcement - and the only reference to your test scenario that you've given is that you're still "having trouble with x/gforce vs two niced encoders", that you've added "some targeted unfairness", that Con's new scheduler is "an utter failure" and something about beating it to a bloody pulp. You haven't detailed what your test actually is or what it's trying to acheive, nor provided anyone else with the means to reproduce it or understand any of the behaviour you're seeing. Now if you've done that in any other thread, consider referencing it instead of worrying about "repeating yourself endlessly". Otherwise, you're making it pretty clear that you're just trying to be difficult, rather than being heard. Remember, this thread is not only cross-posted, but also exists in a high-volume mailing list where things aren't as easy to track as in one's own head. And for Mark and others who are as confused as I was, this is the thread that Mike meant to reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/503455/focus=6614 Cheers, -Kacper