From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753588AbbLIJQe (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:16:34 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.73]:62935 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752512AbbLIJQb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:16:31 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Lee Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, ajitpal.singh@st.com, maxime.coquelin@st.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] ARM: STi: Register CPUFreq device Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 10:15:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3682335.fAt9xNcJFr@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1449585124-15596-9-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1449585124-15596-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1449585124-15596-9-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0FkxB8F6rjzVLXg/8EbjsCx54hgohR8j/4WrHrc+opSQw7t5SUf 4oMTY4+7qFAXP13SNeSSZuElbI8SJQVMPCzQ0SOqqX4+iJoIQLQAlEo7gzz1wpzll1OxlY+ W3PMcilqrKCmFnx2YBJWeBAHEYFOWEv+NNicyQ5sEpewJZOH2VhAEVNT3XbT/DeDMh9X9cw WMRmuqPMbtWfwUH12GUbg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OnrfKpkmgMo=:BJIPgFnkxe2uKhtwStjrDJ jmwG5BlCgS4zqwr3Lyki+qpBWVFbuq6iurm0q8U/ZT9BpYFtYBwBPEGaF3nIeit7QHyjYWkl7 MiXf9W+/8fdVbLnpEs6AayhSpp3TBTahfMBoHXrzVysPhtryx+Sb5A8fW2GHydP+3ZmjtC2G4 llWxlTVPoBboEEW0UfyEfJbjflt+PpNn1z3g3JFQxbCmHhTYetLr/PnnHuA21tqXMgrqrznHO JlcKz7slvsQZxD1hyj542r9A7xewmzV765x2U4poTzkvcRvn+Jq6bxnNYYBJZscMzYS2LGWLm lzhBARfGuYTpxgxb55IPjE0QmOnpO9YzVjnEVCEXDV/bF2/m5o1ufMWeRbwZOyTdAEVWNx8Kg BUY3FD2Kt6h2G/VoVQf49qJnWXmCvCNFGNgfb4gIpMT2CxGcpM2nJTWw0Vec99a6uapQNmQW9 hGydQPee37V0Ch5LhcEHf3fumnOG2fyLbpZRsb1GFCdLW7c83bq02tHfceeDjkHwA5yIYSfi4 FO9wA2EOicNUqLk2SgbHbhyjzXB7sR9hoCH4QfxDmg7QF2BeRa4f+Mdej8gzrG7rDGJlKJLMH Zv5eC8wlGP8baByK8e4CHvY7agUWEx3PrJ4wbMqGxc+3OiOpYv0Uu2HtOFnfWwZJ4rytX2C4g V40SinE5kXy+ahXHNtwtQ69LyDfU0yonUJr07ZY2NC6fMWvK/fGM5Kl49CZVPeVn2voZxGXzd 6JIY0KKY2FG1Le5/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 08 December 2015 14:32:01 Lee Jones wrote: > @@ -161,3 +166,11 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata sti_smp_ops = { > .smp_secondary_init = sti_secondary_init, > .smp_boot_secondary = sti_boot_secondary, > }; > + > +/** > + * CPUFreq Registration > + */ > +void init_cpufreq(void) > +{ > + platform_device_register_simple("sti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0); > +} > Can you please do this under drivers/cpufreq somewhere? I really don't want to any more of these in platform code. Requiring a device to be created just to probe the driver is really silly. Arnd