From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform: surface: fix non-PM_SLEEP build warnings
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:23:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3705938f-6f82-88ef-455b-e0f7459989e3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211190335.16501-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On 12/11/20 8:03 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix build warnings when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled and these
> functions are not used:
>
> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:189:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:184:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 274335f1c557 ("platform/surface: Add Driver to set up lid GPEs on MS Surface device")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-next-20201210.orig/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
> +++ linux-next-20201210/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int surface_lid_enable_wakeup(str
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, true);
> @@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ static int surface_gpe_resume(struct dev
> {
> return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> +#endif
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(surface_gpe_pm, surface_gpe_suspend, surface_gpe_resume);
>
>
Right, thanks.
I assume this covers all instances of this warning in platform/surface?
Otherwise, a "platform: surface: gpe: ..." subject would make more sense.
As for the rest:
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Regards,
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 19:03 [PATCH -next] platform: surface: fix non-PM_SLEEP build warnings Randy Dunlap
2020-12-11 20:23 ` Maximilian Luz [this message]
2020-12-11 20:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-11 21:00 ` Maximilian Luz
2020-12-12 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-12 17:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-12 19:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-14 0:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-14 11:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-14 23:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-12-16 10:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3705938f-6f82-88ef-455b-e0f7459989e3@gmail.com \
--to=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).