From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755392AbcIVGyk (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 02:54:40 -0400 Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:44881 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbcIVGyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 02:54:38 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Daniel Vetter Cc: SF Markus Elfring , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , Tomi Valkeinen , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] GPU-DRM-OMAP: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:54:23 +0300 Message-ID: <3793871.zJbXxf8jdx@avalon> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.6-gentoo; KDE/4.14.24; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160922064501.GF22164@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <0ea38611-3d93-0ade-a1fb-f8cc2e0b8d61@users.sourceforge.net> <20160922064501.GF22164@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 Sep 2016 08:45:01 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:35:59PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > From: Markus Elfring > > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:28:38 +0200 > > > > Several update suggestions were taken into account > > from static source code analysis. > > For the next pile of driver patches _please_ talk with driver maintainers > before starting to create&submit patches. Like I said I won't take them, > and many of your changes are not clear-cut at all, so I expect many driver > maintaines also won't take them. Again, your contributions are welcome, > but blindly following suggestions from code checkers in drivers you cant > test isn't really all that useful. At the scale you're doing it, I think > it's mostly wasting everyone's time :( I'd like to avoid that. I second that. After a very quick review, I see that the series splits related changes in multiple patches. I've already commented in reply to another series submitted by Markus that patches should then be combined. I will thus ignore this series completely for the time being. > > Markus Elfring (14): > > Use kmalloc_array() in tiler_map_show() > > Replace another kmalloc() call by kmalloc_array() in tiler_map_show() > > Less function calls in tiler_map_show() after error detection > > Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in tiler_map_show() > > Improve a size determination in dmm_txn_append() > > Improve a size determination in omap_dmm_probe() > > Rename a jump label in omap_dmm_probe() > > Rename a jump label in dmm_txn_commit() > > Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in dmm_txn_commit() > > Use kmalloc_array() in omap_gem_attach_pages() > > Replace a kzalloc() call by kcalloc() in omap_gem_attach_pages() > > Move a variable assignment in omap_gem_attach_pages() > > Rename a jump label in omap_gem_new_dmabuf() > > Rename a jump label in four functions > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c | 58 +++++++++++++-------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c | 44 +++++++++++------------- > > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart