From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934547Ab3BMQmr (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:42:47 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:47506 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758775Ab3BMQmn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:42:43 -0500 From: "Anna, Suman" To: Russell King - ARM Linux , Linus Walleij CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tony Lindgren , Arnd Bergmann , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Paul Walmsley , "Cousson, Benoit" , Loic Pallardy , Omar Ramirez Luna , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , Janusz Krzysztofik , Dom Cobley , Wim Van Sebroeck , Tejun Heo , Omar Ramirez Luna Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/13] drivers: mailbox: framework creation Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 00/13] drivers: mailbox: framework creation Thread-Index: AQHOCN4g9GGzQKOQDkGhWHRVoYbj7ph4MR0AgAABkID//8xYQA== Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:41:37 +0000 Message-ID: <37C860A02101E749A747FA2D3C1E3C50476638@DLEE12.ent.ti.com> References: <1360645032-9668-1-git-send-email-s-anna@ti.com> <20130213134207.GN17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130213134207.GN17852@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [128.247.5.50] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > > > > > I have hosted the series at [3]. > > > [3] > > > https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox > > > > Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this branch into > > the linux-next tree, so we can get some rotation of this stuff in > > preparation for the v3.10 merge window. (It's not going in now > > anyway.) > > Best wait until after v3.9-rc1 - remember that linux-next is supposed to be a > staging tree for the _next_ merge window only. Yes, will do. Anyway, we need a new revision of one patch (so far) to address Mark Rutland's comments. Thanks Suman