From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754072AbcGSNnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:43:37 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:5989 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753710AbcGSNnb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:43:31 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,389,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1024787593" From: "Liang, Kan" To: David Miller CC: "hannes@stressinduktion.org" , "andi@firstfloor.org" , "fw@strlen.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org" , "kaber@trash.net" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "keescook@chromium.org" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "gorcunov@openvz.org" , "john.stultz@linaro.org" , "aduyck@mirantis.com" , "ben@decadent.org.uk" , "decot@googlers.com" , "Brandeburg, Jesse" Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Thread-Index: AQHR4QAYnLk7kPdiS0Cr9oejSYLaHaAdxziAgAAHaACAADevAIAACwaAgAAjkACAAMKigP//tjMAgAEWLbA= Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:43:26 +0000 Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19F7C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20160718194357.GL5871@two.firstfloor.org> <1468878674.1778899.669950273.69750E32@webmail.messagingengine.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19A4A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20160718.220342.805963245855552246.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20160718.220342.805963245855552246.davem@davemloft.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMGI1YzkwYmMtYjI4NS00NTdlLThlMDEtYjA3MTI3MTBjY2IwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Im5ZY0JUVFpFMDFYbE5jMFVJMWVLNVd2OTJBYXJranRCb1RWMmhXK1ZRWUk9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Yes, rtnl will bring some overheads. But the configuration is one time > > thing for application or socket. It only happens on receiving first > > packet. > > Thanks for destroying our connection rates. > > This kind of overhead is simply unacceptable. If so, I think I can make the configuration asynchronized for next version. The connection rate should not be destroyed. Thanks, Kan