From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753079AbdDLJ7V (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:59:21 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:42210 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752599AbdDLJ7R (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:59:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge To: Mason , Thomas Gleixner References: <91db1f47-3024-9712-309a-fb4b21e42028@free.fr> <310db9dd-7db6-2106-2e53-f0083b2d3758@free.fr> <012f7fcb-eaeb-70dd-a1a9-06c213789d30@arm.com> <0502e180-5517-12d6-e3a1-bcea0da7e201@free.fr> <4edd799a-650c-0189-cd5c-e9fc18c5f8bc@arm.com> <30f662a6-5dab-515b-e35a-a312f3c7b509@free.fr> <5f81730d-fbe3-1f4c-de34-09bbfb893ee1@arm.com> <2b5eef4c-32f2-54f1-ca2f-f9426e68fb2c@free.fr> <67014006-a380-9e3b-c9af-a421052cb8e0@arm.com> <241b130e-1fb7-ecd4-034e-eb02065ada66@free.fr> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Robin Murphy , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liviu Dudau , David Laight , linux-pci , Linux ARM , Thibaud Cornic , Phuong Nguyen , LKML From: Marc Zyngier Organization: ARM Ltd Message-ID: <37cd6172-b04e-fcad-18fc-4fbb26cc611b@arm.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:59:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <241b130e-1fb7-ecd4-034e-eb02065ada66@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/04/17 10:50, Mason wrote: > On 12/04/2017 10:08, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> On 11/04/17 18:52, Mason wrote: >> >>> so data->irq is the virq (30, 34, 35, 36) >>> and data->hwirq is the domain hwirq (0, 524288, 524289, 524290) >>> >>> Is there a way to map hwirq 524288 to MSI 0, hwirq 524289 to MSI 1, etc? >> >> Why would you need to do such a thing? >> - In MSI domain: IRQ34 -> hwirq 524288 >> - In foo domain: IRQ34 -> hwirq [whatever your driver has allocated] >> >> The data is already there, at your fingertips. Just deal with with your >> "foo" irqchip. > > OK, let me take a step back, I may have missed the forest for > the trees. > > In my original code (copied from the Altera driver) I unmasked > a given MSI in the tango_irq_domain_alloc() function. You said > this was the wrong place, as it should be done in the irqchip > unmask callback. Did I understand correctly, so far? Yes. > I have registered custom mask/unmask callbacks for both irq_chips. And that's *wrong*. I've repeatedly said that you only need to deal with *your* irqchip. End of story. Nowhere else. Please leave the MSI irqchip alone, it is very unlikely that you have to provide anything at all to it. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...