linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] Create 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:40:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3823dfb9-cc72-57ae-a296-92d506de1531@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211122120405.7a1e1c9f@gandalf.local.home>



On 22.11.21 18:04, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:12:33 -0500
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> As an alternative, I can offer that we continue to use Link: trailers with
>> extra data following the hashtag, as is already done for other trailers:
>>
>>     Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215101   #report
>>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fobarbaz.5551212@localhost #review
>>
>> Note, that this merely for completeness, not in opposition to the proposal.

Thx, I'll mention those as a alternative in v2

>> I
>> find the "Link:" trailer to be semantically redundant, since what follows is
>> already clearly a hyperlink. Adding "Link: " in front of it is only necessary
>> for consistency and machine parsing reasons.
> 
> Machine parsing is the main reason for the Link: tag. I have scripts that
> key off of that tag and ignore any other "http" reference.
> 
> Perhaps the above is better, as it means we don't need to update our
> scripts for that parsing.

Hmmm. I'm not opposed, but I wonder if 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' are
this tiny bit easier to handle (both for placing and analyzing scripts)
that makes the difference between "nice idea, but fails to be used in
the field" and "after some tradition phase this becomes the new normal"
in the end.

Whatever, will mention that and point to this post in the next round.
Thx for the feedback!

Ciao, Thorsten

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-22  7:33 [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] Create 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-22  7:33 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] docs: add the new commit-msg tags 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-22 16:29   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-22 18:50     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-22 20:24       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-23  8:53         ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-23 18:52   ` Eric Wong
2021-11-24  1:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-24  6:12       ` Eric Wong
2021-11-26 12:49       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-24  2:08     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-26  7:29     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-26 17:11       ` Eric Wong
2021-11-27 19:32         ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-11-27 19:52           ` Eric Wong
2021-11-27 20:20             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-29 12:03               ` Jani Nikula
2021-11-29 17:10                 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-29 17:18                 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-29 19:18                   ` Jani Nikula
2021-11-29 17:26                 ` Eric Wong
2021-11-29 19:20                   ` Jani Nikula
2021-11-30  8:24                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-12-08 13:41                     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-08 17:02                       ` Eric Wong
2021-11-29 22:16   ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-11-30 13:10     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-01 12:24       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-22 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/1] Create 'Reported:' and 'Reviewed:' tags for links in commit messages Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-11-22 17:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-22 18:40     ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2021-11-22 18:48       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3823dfb9-cc72-57ae-a296-92d506de1531@leemhuis.info \
    --to=linux@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).