From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261256AbVBQX72 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:59:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261255AbVBQX72 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:59:28 -0500 Received: from simmts7.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.165]:61173 "EHLO simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261257AbVBQX7S (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:59:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3865.10.10.10.24.1108684615.squirrel@linux1> In-Reply-To: <1108684483.15453.7.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com><4214CC9B.7090001@nortel.com> <3757.10.10.10.24.1108659538.squirrel@linux1><200502171825.08631.tomlins@cam.org><1742.10.10.10.24.1108683124.squirrel@linux1> <1108684483.15453.7.camel@krustophenia.net> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:56:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed From: "Sean" To: "Lee Revell" Cc: "Ed Tomlinson" , "Chris Friesen" , "d.c" , tytso@mit.edu, cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, February 17, 2005 6:54 pm, Lee Revell said: > Ed did not say it was a choice between BK and nothing. He said "Linus > has tried other SCMs. They did not suffice." Did you even read his > comment? The point you missed is that it's not an honest comparison to look at the post BK/ pre BK situation and pretend that BK was the only option that would have produced the list of benefits that Ed outlined. Linus has been known to be wrong before. > Please don't cc: me on this thread anymore, unless it's about some work > you did to bring BK functionality to a free SCM. No need to respond. Cheers, Sean