From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:43:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <386C0CB1-C4B1-43E2-A754-DA8DBE4FB3CB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXNckT9W288VXx-6inO5qYn-6dUPocKGcBT0GCO3xi3ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Lutomirski
Sent: November 13, 2018 at 5:16:09 PM GMT
> To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, open list:DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:25 AM Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've been studying v4 of the patch-set [1] that Nadav has been working on.
>> Incidentally, I think it would be useful to cc also the
>> security/hardening ml.
>> The patch-set seems to be close to final, so I am resuming this discussion.
>>
>> On 30/10/2018 19:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> I support the addition of a rare-write mechanism to the upstream kernel. And I think that there is only one sane way to implement it: using an mm_struct. That mm_struct, just like any sane mm_struct, should only differ from init_mm in that it has extra mappings in the *user* region.
>>
>> After reading the code, I see what you meant.
>> I think I can work with it.
>>
>> But I have a couple of questions wrt the use of this mechanism, in the
>> context of write rare.
>>
>>
>> 1) mm_struct.
>>
>> Iiuc, the purpose of the patchset is mostly (only?) to patch kernel code
>> (live patch?), which seems to happen sequentially and in a relatively
>> standardized way, like replacing the NOPs specifically placed in the
>> functions that need patching.
>>
>> This is a bit different from the more generic write-rare case, applied
>> to data.
>>
>> As example, I have in mind a system where both IMA and SELinux are in use.
>>
>> In this system, a file is accessed for the first time.
>>
>> That would trigger 2 things:
>> - evaluation of the SELinux rules and probably update of the AVC cache
>> - IMA measurement and update of the measurements
>>
>> Both of them could be write protected, meaning that they would both have
>> to be modified through the write rare mechanism.
>>
>> While the events, for 1 specific file, would be sequential, it's not
>> difficult to imagine that multiple files could be accessed at the same time.
>>
>> If the update of the data structures in both IMA and SELinux must use
>> the same mm_struct, that would have to be somehow regulated and it would
>> introduce an unnecessary (imho) dependency.
>>
>> How about having one mm_struct for each writer (core or thread)?
>
> I don't think that helps anything. I think the mm_struct used for
> prmem (or rare_write or whatever you want to call it) should be
> entirely abstracted away by an appropriate API, so neither SELinux nor
> IMA need to be aware that there's an mm_struct involved. It's also
> entirely possible that some architectures won't even use an mm_struct
> behind the scenes -- x86, for example, could have avoided it if there
> were a kernel equivalent of PKRU. Sadly, there isn't.
>
>> 2) Iiuc, the purpose of the 2 pages being remapped is that the target of
>> the patch might spill across the page boundary, however if I deal with
>> the modification of generic data, I shouldn't (shouldn't I?) assume that
>> the data will not span across multiple pages.
>
> The reason for the particular architecture of text_poke() is to avoid
> memory allocation to get it working. i think that prmem/rare_write
> should have each rare-writable kernel address map to a unique user
> address, possibly just by offsetting everything by a constant. For
> rare_write, you don't actually need it to work as such until fairly
> late in boot, since the rare_writable data will just be writable early
> on.
>
>> If the data spans across multiple pages, in unknown amount, I suppose
>> that I should not keep interrupts disabled for an unknown time, as it
>> would hurt preemption.
>>
>> What I thought, in my initial patch-set, was to iterate over each page
>> that must be written to, in a loop, re-enabling interrupts in-between
>> iterations, to give pending interrupts a chance to be served.
>>
>> This would mean that the data being written to would not be consistent,
>> but it's a problem that would have to be addressed anyways, since it can
>> be still read by other cores, while the write is ongoing.
>
> This probably makes sense, except that enabling and disabling
> interrupts means you also need to restore the original mm_struct (most
> likely), which is slow. I don't think there's a generic way to check
> whether in interrupt is pending without turning interrupts on.
I guess that enabling IRQs might break some hidden assumptions in the code,
but is there a fundamental reason that IRQs need to be disabled? use_mm()
got them enabled, although it is only suitable for kernel threads.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20181023213504.28905-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] prmem: linker section for static write rare Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 02/17] prmem: write rare for static allocation Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 0:24 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-29 18:03 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-29 20:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] prmem: vmalloc support for dynamic allocation Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 0:26 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-29 18:07 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] prmem: " Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] prmem: shorthands for write rare on common types Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 0:28 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-29 18:12 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] prmem: test cases for memory protection Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 3:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-24 14:24 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 16:43 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-29 18:16 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] prmem: lkdtm tests " Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 08/17] prmem: struct page: track vmap_area Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 3:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-24 23:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 2:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-29 18:21 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] prmem: hardened usercopy Igor Stoppa
2018-10-29 11:45 ` Chris von Recklinghausen
2018-10-29 18:24 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 3:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-10-24 14:30 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 23:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-10-29 19:05 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26 10:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-29 19:28 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 10:46 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-28 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-29 21:04 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-30 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 16:37 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 17:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-30 17:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-30 18:03 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-31 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 18:28 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-30 19:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-30 20:43 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-30 21:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-30 21:07 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:25 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-30 22:15 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-31 20:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 20:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 21:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-30 21:49 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 4:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 9:08 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 19:38 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-31 20:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-31 22:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 23:10 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 23:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-31 23:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-01 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-01 15:58 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-01 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 18:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-10-30 19:14 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-30 21:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-30 21:55 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-30 22:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-31 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 23:18 ` Nadav Amit
2018-10-31 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-01 16:31 ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-02 21:11 ` Nadav Amit
2018-10-31 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-31 11:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-13 14:25 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 17:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 17:43 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2018-11-13 17:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 18:06 ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-13 18:31 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 18:33 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 18:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 19:03 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-21 16:34 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-21 17:36 ` Nadav Amit
2018-11-21 18:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-21 18:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22 19:27 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-22 20:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-22 20:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-04 12:34 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 18:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 19:35 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 18:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-11-13 18:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-13 19:01 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-31 9:27 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 11:09 ` Markus Heiser
2018-10-29 19:35 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 15:05 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-10-29 19:38 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-29 20:35 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 11/17] prmem: llist: use designated initializer Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] prmem: linked list: set alignment Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 13/17] prmem: linked list: disable layout randomization Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 13:43 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2018-10-29 19:40 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26 10:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-30 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 14/17] prmem: llist, hlist, both plain and rcu Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 11:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-10-24 14:03 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-24 14:56 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-24 22:52 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 8:11 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-10-28 9:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-29 19:43 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-26 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 15/17] prmem: test cases for prlist and prhlist Igor Stoppa
2018-10-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 16/17] prmem: pratomic-long Igor Stoppa
2018-10-25 0:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-29 21:17 ` Igor Stoppa
2018-10-30 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-30 16:28 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-31 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-01 3:28 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 17/17] prmem: ima: turn the measurements list write rare Igor Stoppa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=386C0CB1-C4B1-43E2-A754-DA8DBE4FB3CB@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=igor.stoppa@gmail.com \
--cc=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).