From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932196AbeCKTdn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2018 15:33:43 -0400 Received: from lilium.sigma-star.at ([109.75.188.150]:37612 "EHLO lilium.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141AbeCKTdm (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Mar 2018 15:33:42 -0400 From: Richard Weinberger To: Arvind Yadav Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com, cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr, dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mtd: use put_device() if device_register fail Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 20:35:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3975609.gPYExXdWMR@blindfold> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 11:50:47 CET schrieb Arvind Yadav: > if device_register() returned an error! Always use put_device() > to give up the reference initialized. > > Arvind Yadav (2): > [PATCH 1/2] mtd: use put_device() if device_register fail > [PATCH 2/2] mtd: ubi: use put_device() if device_register fail Uhh, this is not obvious. Does device_register() really always return with a reference held in all (error) cases? Thanks, //richard