From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:44:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:44:27 -0500 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:57616 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:44:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3A42AA60.80FA07F7@innominate.de> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:12:00 +0100 From: Daniel Phillips Organization: innominate X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Cassella , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup In-Reply-To: <3A42380B.6E9291D1@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Cassella wrote: > > int atomic_read_and_clear(atomic_t *p) > > { > > int n = atomic_read(p); > > atomic_sub(p, n); > > return n; > > } > > I don't think this will work; consider two callers doing the atomic_read() > at the same time, or someone else doing an atomic_dec() after the > atomic_read(). Oh yes, mea culpa, this is a terrible primitive, yet it works for this application. 1) We don't have two callers 2) We only have atomic_inc from the other processes, and it's ok for the atomic_inc to occur after the atomic_read because that means the atomic_inc'er will then proceed to up() the atomic_sub'ers semaphore, and it won't block. I much preferred my original waiters = xchg(&sem.count, 0), but as noted it doesn't work with sparc. A satisfying approach would be to create the new primitive up_down, which simplifies everything dramatically. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/