From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:16:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:15:57 -0500 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:56079 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3A6D42D5.ED8552D0@idb.hist.no> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:37:41 +0100 From: Helge Hafting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: no, da, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Satchell CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT?] Coding Style In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010122130852.00b92a80@mail.fluent-access.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Satchell wrote: [lots of good advice deleted] > One goal of language designers is to REMOVE the need for comments. With a > good fourth-generation or fifth-generation language, the need for comments > diminishes to a detailed description of the data sets and any highly > unusual operations or transforms on the data. This is but a dream. You can't "design out" the need for comments by approaching natural language. Try reading a law book and realize that natural language too may be twisted to the extent that it needs extensive comments. The same goes for any computer language powerful enough to do useful work. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/