From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:01:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:01:32 -0500 Received: from colorfullife.com ([216.156.138.34]:30213 "EHLO colorfullife.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:01:13 -0500 Message-ID: <3A7E95F3.38B26DC@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 13:00:51 +0100 From: Manfred Spraul X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" CC: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Steve Lord , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains In-Reply-To: <20010201220744.K11607@redhat.com> <20010205110336.A1167@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > > You simply cannot do physical disk IO on > non-sector-aligned memory or in chunks which aren't a multiple of > sector size. Why not? Obviously the disk access itself must be sector aligned and the total length must be a multiple of the sector length, but there shouldn't be any restrictions on the data buffers. I remember that even Windoze 95 has scatter-gather support for physical disk IO with arbitraty buffer chunks. (If the hardware supports it, otherwise the io subsystem will copy the data into a contiguous temporary buffer) -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/