From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261562AbREUGgm>; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:36:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261601AbREUGgc>; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:36:32 -0400
Received: from james.kalifornia.com ([208.179.59.2]:56432 "EHLO
	james.kalifornia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261562AbREUGgT>; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:36:19 -0400
Message-ID: <3B08B6B0.4010907@kalifornia.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:33:20 -0700
From: Ben Ford <ben@kalifornia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010505
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
In-Reply-To: <20010520185827.B16356@thune.mrc-home.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Mike Castle wrote:

>On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:29:17AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
>>distributions). 18 months is more realistic for it to be deployed
>>widely enough.
>>
>
>People who are going to be savvy enough to install a development 2.5.*
>kernel that is defining a new configuration utility are going to be savvy
>enough to install python.
>
>mrc
>
Not only that, but Alan said that somebody is rewriting it in C.

-- 
 "One trend that bothers me is the glorification of
stupidity, that the media is reassuring people it's 
alright not to know anything. That to me is far more 
dangerous than a little pornography on the Internet." 
  - Carl Sagan